Quantcast
Channel: TwoCircles.net - Articles
Viewing all 715 articles
Browse latest View live

Delhi elections: What Okhla residents want?

$
0
0

By Saiyed Danish for TwoCircles.net,

New Delhi: With Asif Mohammad Khan, the incumbent MLA form Okhla assembly seat, having percolated to the Congress party from his old-flame Rashtriya Janta Dal (RJD) hoping to benefit from the maelstrom which has been brain-teasing the Muslim voters due to Modi’s declaration as BJP’s PM candidate and that too just before the beginning of the crucial campaigning season, the race for Okhla seat in the upcoming Delhi Assembly polls due in December, which arguably houses the best pack of Muslim intelligentsia in the city, has now heated up.

In fray, are unsurprisingly the local chieftains of the town buckling up to take the plunge. With formal declaration of the candidates from their respective parties still awaited, TwoCircles.net spoke to the residents of Okhla to gauge their mood, in whose name the aspirants of the assembly seat from this South-East border seat of Delhi will be placing their lofty bets, to fathom their thoughts on the coming election.



“Yahan ek paani ke motor se das ghar chalte hain (ten families depend on one water motor for their daily supplies here)”, says Asif (45), a shopkeeper in Okhla Vihar. Sultan, who runs a general store in Okhla Vihar amplifies the complaint, “Sanitary conditions are poor here. The sewages get jammed for days and weeks but nobody comes to redress the problem.”

Sukhdev Vihar, the posh and greener side of the constituency too has its own grievance in the long list of complaints, “It is high time that traffic and parking problems need to solved,” says Varsha Garg, a DU student living in Sukhdev Vihar.

Shahana Anjum (26), a resident of Shaheen Bagh says, “Roads form the crust of our problems,” pointing to regular traffic jams on the main road connecting Jamia Millia Islamia with Kalindi Kunj. The roads should’ve been broadened to prevent congestion and free flow of traffic, she adds.

But most incensed are the people of Batla House, “Five months ago they dug the ground at two steps claiming to build new roads and never came back,” complains Dr. Mujibur Rehman (35), a local social worker. “We will not let any leader even show his ugly face here,” he says angrily.

With most of the issues concerning the daily livelihood of the residents converging at the door steps of Zakir Nagar and Batla House, these two areas have become the hotbeds of public umbrage. “The new water connections are fraud, we would get more water through the old pipes,” complains Nadeem (30), who runs errands for a ration shop in Zakir Nagar.



Another person, Ajmal (35), registers his agitation, “you look around, do you see good schools, or affordable hospitals for us anywhere, all we have around us are these incompetent and poorly equipped government schools in the name of education and Holy Family hospital in the name of healthcare which puts a hole in the pocket more than it heals.”

The Okhla residents claim that they are completely disenchanted by the promises of different leaders and it is difficult for them to name even one person as a harbinger of hope.

But the announcement of Modi as BJP’s PM candidate seems to negatively play here, which came into prominence after the infamous Batla House police shootout. “I may end up voting for Congress just to keep Narendra Modi at bay but that favour should not be mistaken for loyalty to the party. Major incidents of illegal detentions of innocent Muslims happened when the Congress was in the Centre, the government could have prevented them but failed miserably,” says another local resident.

Aam Aadmi Party (AAP), is believed to have been making inroads in the hearts of middle class by its ‘broom’ theme which revolves around cleansing the system from within, Faraz Khan, a graduate student at Jamia Millia Islamia exuberantly says, “I wanted this Congress-BJP monotony broken and now we have a chance to vote for a third option which AAP.”



Asad Ashraf, an activist and a post graduate student in Peace and Resolution Conflict from Jamia Millia Islamia warns, “Since the infamous Batla House encounter, local politicians have tried to chariot the fake-encounter cause for their vested interests but blustery speeches and melodrama over serious issues of cherry-picking of innocent youths will not work this time around.”

Also, the Okhla residents vehemently spoke against an amalgamation of religion and politics.“Inclusive growth is impossible in such type politics,” opines Ali (35), owner of a fast food joint in Ghaffar Manzil area. Speaking about his preference he says, he will vote for a party which is not afraid to take bold decisions, but are beneficial in the long-term.

The cases of harassment and illegal arrests of innocent Muslims and ‘secular’ governments to avoid dozens of small and big scale riots in the U.P, especially in Muzaffarnagar, have caused a section of minority, whose umbilical cords trace back to the state, to revise its allegiance plan.

Ajju (41), lashes out at Congress and says, “My family is voting for BJP, we have to teach Congress a lesson. If Narendra Modi kills in genocide, Congress kills by the weapon of famines and corporate loot.” “I can show you a few more men standing there who have the same views as me,” he adds confidently pointing his fingers towards a tea stall swarmed by locals.



Expressing his disenchantment, Hari Singh (39), a tea shop owner and resident of Abul Fazal enclave, however, reveals “I have not voted for the past two terms,” when asked about his political preferences in the light of the opening Delhi Assembly elections.

Unavailability of drinking water seems to be the crown of all worries. However, demands for better roads, smoother traffic and construction of parking lots are not also far behind. As Batla House encounter issue seems to be all but deflating as a poll plank, the question of basic amenities and infrastructure may lead the stride this time.

Thus while local developmental issues seems to be the main agenda for the voters in making their choice, national issues, particularly those concerning the community also appears to be important factor.


Modi’s-Abusing History for Political mileage

$
0
0

By Ram Puniyani,

The politics of Modi’s parent organization RSS is based on distortion of history, medieval history in particular. To begin with the projection of kings through the prism of religion, to demonize Muslim kings based on distortions and falsehoods of History, and then in turn spreading hatred against Muslims of today has been the foundation on which RSS built it up. Taking the same method to further lower levels currently Narendra Modi is trampling, distorting the facts of history to project his ideology. In the last week, October 2013, he addressed two meetings and gave one interview which showed the levels to which he can fall to score the political mileage.

In Sardar Patel memorial inauguration; Modi said that Sardar Patel should have been the first Prime minister of India. This was a dig at two major leaders of freedom movement, Mahatma Gandhi and Pundit Jawaharlal Nehru. One recalls that Mahatma Gandhi, father of Indian Nation, was the one who had the mandate of the whole nation, irrespective of region, religion, gender and caste. It was left to Gandhi to nominate the Prime Minister and he unhesitatingly named Nehru to be the first Prime minister of the country. There might have been different factors weighing on the mind of Mahatma, as Sardar Patel and Nehru both were his closest disciples. He knew both of them thoroughly, and he made the choice. Patel went on to be the deputy Prime Minster and Home minister, in which capacity he was instrumental in merging over 550 princely states in to Indian union, a remarkable contribution to Indian nationalism. Nehru as Prime minister laid the foundation of all the policies related to industrial growth, education, foreign affairs and became the ‘architect of Modern India’, India on the path of Industrialization and education, the foundations due to which today India has been catapulted to be one of the major economic powers in the world.

Surely, in such a marathon enterprise the contribution of his Cabinet colleagues should not be underestimated. While criticism of some of his policies is in order, the credit for trying to take India out of the feudal society, the society of blatant slavery of dominated castes and women, to the society with democratic values of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, were also laid under his indomitable leadership. Sardar Patel is being projected by Modi-RSS despite knowing that Patel was deeply committed to Indian Nationalism, staunch follower of Gandhi and a thoroughly secular person. RSS has none of this, RSS-Modi are totally opposed to the values, which Sardar espoused. The first thing which Modi tries to do in this direction is to emotionally undermine the role of Pundit Nehru. He went to the extent of saying in one of the interviews given to a Hindi daily, that Nehru did not attend the funeral ceremony of Patel. This is a total concoction. This blatant lie was immediately exposed as the Times of India, on front page had covered this event and prominently told the readers about the presence of President Dr. Rajendra Prasad and Prime Minister Pundit Nehru on the occasion. It also published the deep condolences of Nehru who said that Sardar Patel has contributed immensely to the process of India’s freedom and making of India. Congress Leader Digvijay Singh has posted the clip of the documentary showing Nehru attending the funeral. Also it was recalled that Morarji Desai in his autobiography Volume I page 271, Para 2 mentioned the presence of Pundit Nehru on the occasion. In the face of this Modi retracted his statement, and usual things about being misquoted etc were dished out.

It is surprising that RSS-Modi are trying to project a person as their icon, who had banned their organization after the murder of father of the nation. In his letter to the RSS Chief M.S. Golwalkar, Sardar Patel wrote, “All their (RSS) leaders’ speeches were full of communal poison. As a final result, the poisonous atmosphere was created in which such a ghastly tragedy (Gandhi’s murder) became possible.” (Excerpts from Sardar Patel’s letter, in Outlook April 27, 1998) Same Outlook issue tells us that RSS expressed their joy and distributed sweets after Gandhi’s death. One can add that by attacking the choice of Mahatma Gandhi for the Prime ministerial post, Modi is continuing the work of Hindu nationalism’s attack on Indian Nationalism started by Godse. This Hindu nationalist, Godse, attacked Gandhi for insisting on Indian Nationalism and now another Hindu Nationalist Modi is attacking Mahatma for his choice of the Prime Minister. This attempt of Modi to say that Sardar Patel Should have been the Prime Minister instead of Nehru, more than undermining Nehru is a direct attack on Gandhi. Not surprising! As Modi belongs to the Hindu nationalism school of thought for whom Gandhi and his ideology were not acceptable for their strong support for diversity of India. Here they also undermine Sardar Patel who was equally committed to the values of pluralism and secularism of India, in shaping which he contributed immensely. Patel was committed to actualize Gandhi’s dream of secular India, and for this he contributed all his life.

Neetish Kumar in another part of the country; pointed out two major things. One as to how Modi spoke lies about Chandragupta Maurya being from Gupta dynasty, while he was from Maurya dynasty. Second that Alexander came up to Ganges. As a matter of fact, Alexander returned from the banks of Sutlej. Modi displayed his knowledge or lack of it by saying that Taxila belongs to Bihar, while it is in Western part and is currently part of Pakistan. Modi’s these utterances were meant to play to the gallery in Patna meeting. The Patna meeting was called as Hunkar rally, Hunkar means speaking something vociferously and with arrogance, a sign of fascist mind set.

Modi also exhorted the audience to ‘weed out’ opponents. This is the mindset of a fascist again who wants to eliminate the opponents. This is what Hitler did, weeding out Jews, Trade Unionists and Communist during his regime. While currently Modi is focusing on political opponents, his ideology of Hindu nationalism has spread the slogan of Pehle Kasai phir Isai. (First the Muslims, then the Christians) So here we are witnessing a dangerous scenario emerging. Attack on Indian Nationalism, by attacking the choice of Gandhi for Prime Minister’s post. A total distortion of history to play to the gallery, Goebbels style. And use of a language which fascists routinely do, of weeding out others.

At this point of time to compare RSS-BJP-Modi with any other electoral formation is dangerous as BJP is a different cup of tea, it is molded for Hindu nationalism, and Modi with his fascist tendencies is unable to conceal his fangs. Those equating BJP-Modi with any other party are doing a fatal mistake, which the country may have to regret later at the cost of loosing democracy. Let’s recall that Hitler also came to power through democratic means. Having once come to power, he was quick enough to abolish democracy and impose fascism through his multiple wings, storm troopers, foot soldiers on one side and the followers of his ideology in different forms, on the other. Warning bells are loud and clear, those wanting to live in a democratic Indian nation need to take it as a wakeup call.

The Corporates: Behind the shining glass

$
0
0

By Azizur Rahman, TwoCircles.net

Whatever might be the definition of the word “corporate” from the business perspective; and whatever economic growth, the government might have been claiming to have achieved through the corporate employments; in fact, the corporate job is taking a huge toll on the young workforce making them intellectually and socially bankrupt and robbing them of everything except for the bloodsucking token money. The corporates remain hell bent on exploiting even the last drop of the blood. Let’s take a detailed account of the devastating havoc it wreaks on the employees. Please bear in mind that when I say corporate, I mean the private company and not any government organization where the employees are more relaxed than at home since it takes them half an hour to issue a counter train ticket.

Social Isolation
Doing job in a corporate is replete with sacrifices. You sacrifice the joy of being with your near and dear ones whenever you want if working away from home, and in case of working somewhere near your hometown, you are unable to spend enough time with them due to lack of time, tight schedule and the fatigue inflicted by the crushing daylong work. The working hours are only on the paper and not in practice. They create such a pressure that one will automatically stretch for hours beyond the specified working hours to meet their so called customer expectations and “Turn Around Time” notoriously called as TAT and thereby leaving the least leisure time for family, friends and near and dear ones. The corporate employees always seem to be in such a hurry that they do not even shake hand properly lest it could result in some work not being done in time. Except for rare cases, a job in corporate means we will have to forget celebrating festivals with the family; we will not have to think of attending marriages, birth celebrations and funerals and so on. The life here is not much different from a machine working through a human body. Taking leave at your desired and convenient time is like milking a bull. So, if this grave state of isolation from the family and society is life, then what is the death?



Behind the shining glass

Intellectual Bankruptcy
Another significant damage that corporates cause to a person is the intellectual insolvency. They keep people occupied to such a dangerous extent that they are unable to think beyond home-to-office and vice-versa cycle. I have come across some instances where people did not even know their country's president, vice president and key ministers’ names. So, if the people working with a corporate are so ignorant of these basic information, how they would prove fruitful to the nation and the people, at least by using their voting rights. As surviving in this shrewd and callous world with dignity requires people to be sufficiently aware of the state of affairs around them, one has to think beyond managing the daily square meals; however the corporates seldom leave any chances to let them think beyond.

24/7 Business Cycle and Its Impact
In this era of globalization, the policy of business continuity round the clock is a dangerous phenomenon. The corporates, in order to maximize their profit in the least possible time, have adopted the strategy of the business being run through the entire 24 hours day cycle at the cost of extreme hardships meted out to the employees. At the time of joining, either the companies ask their employees to accept by signing that they would work in any shifts including night shifts if required; or they would forcibly push them into any odd shift depending upon the requirement. One can imagine how challenging that would be for a person, working throughout the night and then managing his/her own affairs in the daylight including sleep that cannot be substituted with the one in night. Owing to this evil practice, the employee’s own life gets reduced to an abject toy being played whenever required leaving no room for his/her own priorities.
For this nefarious practice, the corporates alone could not be blamed and the government is equally responsible as this happens under the very approval from it, for cheap economic growth.

Stagnant Compensation
The salaries offered by the corporates might look attractive and luring to people, however once offered they remain almost stagnant compared to the related inflation. Companies often set such ambiguous benchmarks and expectations that are barely achievable. Even if you toil day and night and achieve 100 % as per the defined parameters, at the end of the day you would listen to the wise sentence “Its good, however we expected even more from a person like you” resulting in getting you minimum for the maximum. As these companies are well trained in keeping the sparks of hope alive among the employees by extending promises like that of extending grass to a horse and keep holding it back one he comes nearer, many times, many people slip unintentionally into a long association with the company and ultimately getting even more frustrated.

Health Hazards
Due to hard and demanding work, working for longer hours and working at odd times like night, many times it results in depression, frequent headache, entire body pain, back pain and sometimes even diabetes and many more. So, working in a corporate environment for longer years is bound to entail one disease or the other. In view of the above, it is wise to bid adieu to the corporate at the earliest before it is too late to make a comeback as you would become more crippled with the passage of the time and the corporate hold upon you would emerge stronger.

Government’s Responsibility
To address this menace, first of all, the government should ban the inhuman odd shifts particularly night shift system as there is no use of the money earned through depriving people of the natural sleep. It should also warn the companies of asking employees to stretch beyond the legally specified working hours. However, in extreme cases, it could be allowed against the mandatory pay for the extra time worked. It must formulate very strict regulations to ensure that the companies provide a very comfortable and conducive work environment where one could work free from stress and pressure because there is no meaning of the economic growth and development brought thorough comprising on the quality of people’s lives. However this is something that could hardly be expected from the greedy government which would not want to let its patrons sulk, resulting in lesser taxes to be wasted on luxuries and illegitimate amenities for these insensitive and corrupt politicians.

--
Azizur Rahman is originally from Uttar Pradesh and works for a multinational corporation in Chennai.

Muslims are extremely marginalized, need state support: Abdul Shaban

$
0
0

By Rehan Ansari, TwoCircles.net

Abdul Shaban is member of high powered Post Sachar Evaluation Committee constituted by the Government of India with Ministry of Minorities Affairs as nodal ministry. He was member of Maharashtra Chief Minister's Study Group on Muslims under Chairmanship of Mahmoodur Rahman (IAS, retired and former vice-chancellor of AMU, Aligarh) which recently submitted its report.

Abdul Shaban is BA (Honours) from AMU, Aligarh, and M.A. from Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi. He completed his M.Phil. and Ph.D. from Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Mumbai. He has published three books and over 30 papers in various refereed national and international journals and edited books. Dr.Shaban has been Visiting Professor at the Department of Geography, University of Paris, France, and at University of Masaryk (Brno) and Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. He has also been Fellow at the Department of Geography and Environment, LSE, London. He was Commonwealth Academic Staff Fellow at Cities Programme, London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE), London during 2011-12. Presently he is Chairperson of International Students Office (ISO) of Tata Institute of Social Sciences, and coordinating from TISS the Erasmus Mundus India to Europe Scholarships Programme (a programme of European Commission).

He talked to Rehan Ansari of twocircles.net on the report, general conditions of Muslims, affirmative action required for the upliftment of Indian Muslims.

TCN: What’s the difference between Sachar Committee Report and Dr.Mahmoodur Rahman Report?

Sachar Committee attempted to look into socio-economic situation of Muslims at the national level while Mahmoodur Rahman Committee attempted to do the same at the state level. Sachar Committee examined the macro data, but the programmes are needed to be implemented at the micro/meso levels for which more pragmatic and contextual approaches are needed. The Mahmoodur Rahman Committee attempts to provide the same. Another major difference between the Sachar Committee Report and Mahmoodur Rahaman Committee is that where the former showed the marginalisation of Indian Muslims, Mahmoodur Rahman Committee goes further to recommend many specific measures to overcome the marginalisation among Muslims in Maharashtra. The recommendation by the Mahmoodur Rahman Committee ranges from how to end violence against community to how the community can be made an important constituent in national development process. The report also recommends measures how to address the difficulty which community members face in everyday life.

TCN: Why was it needed?

In my view, many of the issues related to Muslims in India are not the same in every state, though some commonality can surely be established. Therefore, every state requires a committee to bring forth the issues Muslims are facing in that state. This underscores the importance of Mahmoodur Rahman Committee.



Abdul Shaban is associated with Tata Institute of Social Sciences (TISS)

TCN: What are the important points of these reports and recommendations since it has been leaked and reported in the media?

Media always finds its ways to the best kept secrets. Media has its own role in development of the society through information dissemination. Though unfortunate, still the information which have found their way to media from the report have gone to make people’s opinion and create debate and discussions. I am sure that the government will create political consensus, will take both the majority and minority communities into confidence and will act on the recommendation of the report. The importance of the recommendations does not decrease because some of them have found their way to media.

TCN: Don’t you think the timing of this report is politically motivated since it was ready long ago as reported in other newspapers?

Although, committee was constituted in 2008 but work on it could seriously start last year, June (2012). The report was ready sometime in June this year but reading, typing and printing took some time.

TCN: Governments do not seem to follow Reports of Commissions and their recommendations.

I agree with you. Governments have often failed to act on well-meaning recommendations of the committees and commissions. There are various reasons for this and they range from lack of seriousness in government to fear of consequences if something that is rightly recommended is done. For instance the recommendations by the Shri Krishna Commission on riots in Mumbai in 1992.

TCN: We have heard that you have been working on PM’s 15 Point programme review committee.

The Government of India, with Ministry of Minorities Affairs as nodal ministry, has constituted a 10 members committee to evaluate the implementation and outcomes of the programmes formulated and implemented for the welfare of the religious minorities(based on the recommendation of the Sachar Committee Report). As a member of the Committee, I am specifically looking at PM 15 points programme. I will attempt to pool the information and suggestions together and take the same to the committee for their final say and suggestions. I will request the civil society organisations and well-meaning people to send their suggestions and recommendations to the committee enable it to provide necessary suggestions to the government for the course corrections in the programmes and to make them more effective.

TCN: You have been doing research on Muslims in Maharashtra and India, what are your observation and suggestions for their upliftment?

As an academician, my first observation on Muslims is that it is an extremely marginalised community of India. It requires state supports for its development. The State has always come to the help of the marginalised communities as we have seen in the case of SCs and STs. The reports of committees and commissions in recent years have brought deprivation among Muslims to increased focus and that is why today we find a large consensus among both the majority and minority communities towards the affirmative actions for the development of Muslims. My suggestions to the government will be to rather than politicising the Muslims deprivation issues, create political consensus and act on them. There are some basic principles of equality, justice and citizenship already enshrined in the Constitutions, act on them to end the prejudices, biases and fear. The state has important role to ensure that developed gets delivered equally to all.



"The younger generation of the community has started demanding development more vociferously"

TCN: If you have to choose three main reasons for backwardness of Muslims, what will they be?

For me, development of a community is linked with internal dynamics within the community and the opportunities the larger society provides to the community. Also, the lack of educational opportunities and income capabilities can perpetuate the vicious circle of poverty within a community. The positive intervention/affirmative actions by the state can break the vicious circle and put the community on virtuous path/cycle. With these understanding, I would like to say that Muslim community today largely lives in vicious circle of poverty and the affirmative actions by the government will be very important towards the development of the community.

In my view, the reasons for poverty among Muslims are: 1. Lack of relevant education, 2. Lack of income/opportunities/infrastructure to support the children for relevant (higher) education, 3. Bias in job market and government recruitments that results in unemployment/underemployment of even those having achieved some higher level of education resulting in overall low expectation from education among Muslims. This perpetuates the vicious circle. This is where the government and larger society need to intervene to provide positive discrimination in the job market to Muslims.I would also like to add the fourth and fifth factors for the backwardness of Muslims-- these are endemic communal riots and lack of adequate freedom of Muslim women for their education and career choice. Where the violence against the community destroys its cumulative earnings, capital accumulated over the years and breaks the established economic and social networks, the limited educational choice and career options available to a large segment of Muslim women keep away a large segment of the community members from effectively contributing to the development of the community and country. This latter is well reflected from the lower work participation rate of Muslim women. However, one also needs to understand that the above factors are also linked with each other in complex ways.

TCN: The reports are written for the government so their recommendations are for the government, but what will you suggest to the Muslim community as to what they can do to help themselves?

Yes, it is unfortunate that despite many well-meaning and profound suggestions by many committees and commissions, the governments (both the central and states) have not taken them seriously but acted towards the community with tokenism. During the election times grand schemes are announced and promises are made to garner the community votes, but after elections the promises are forgotten. Real and mythical fears of ‘others’ are circulated. This leads the Muslim community not to vote for development but out of fear.

However, Muslim community is going through a great social and political metamorphosis. The younger generation of the community has started demanding development more vociferously and in recent years setting up of several committees and commissions have been outcomes of the same. On the other hand, this younger generation has also moved away from sectarian, communal and conservative internal politics to rebuild the community (through reorganisation of the community) and mobilisation of resources from non-governmental sphere. This is why you find so many civil society groups (NGOs/CBOs) emerging among Muslims, organising and channelizing the energy of the community in positive ways. A few years back finding a Muslim NGO used to be difficult but today one will find many in every city/town. However, role of the government remains very important, these civil society organisation can meaningfully contribute to the State efforts, they cannot replace the State.

1TCN: We know that the Muslims lagging behind in various socio-economic indicators but what are the areas they seem to improving faster than others? What are the silver linings in the clouds?

I think Muslim community of India is progressing very fast in three spheres:
1. They have shown enormous change in their political approach. Today they are not driven by the conservative politics of 1980s but are more open to debate and discussions.
2. The young girls have entered higher and middle levels of education in considerable number in recent years. Their share has suddenly jumped.
3. Considerable numbers of intellectual and younger groups have joined the media and social networking sites (social media) and are discussing and deliberating on the issues related to development of the community and harmonizing the community’s relations with other communities.

These three changes in the Muslims community underscore the latent energy within the community, self-reflexivity of the community and desire to walk on the path of development rapidly along other communities if provided right kind of opportunity and atmosphere.

As opposed to this trend, during the last 10 years or so we have seen increased communalisation of majority community youth mainly due to influence of right wing politics, social media and also the mythical programmes/stories in print and visual media.

TCN: What is your say on the legality of reservations to Muslims in education and employments in the secular country like ours?

Legality and illegality should not be taken as constant – time neutral. rules and regulations change with time and need. A large segment of the country’s population, Muslims, is socio-economically as deprived as dalits in the country. They face discrimination in everyday life on the basis of their religion while many from the community face double discrimination – both on the basis of religion and also due to their castes. It is surprising that presidential order of 1950s did not recognise caste (which is basic organising structure of every community in the country) in Islam.

In recent years, many reports have shown the socio-economic marginality ofMuslims and in fact many states have attempted to ensure reservation for Muslims on the basis of religion or carving out sub-quota within overall OBC quota. Though some of their attempts have been struck down by courts but that should not discourage the political parties. In my view, all the states ruled by secular and progressive forces should join together and appeal to the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision on limits for the reservation and also quota on the basis of religion. When about 80% of the population of the country comes from marginalised sections, the limit of reservation up to 50% in fact provides reverse reservation to advantageous 20% of the population. With about 20% of the population, this advantageous group is able to secure 50% of the jobs for themselves. This for me is gross social injustice.

A majority of the Muslims in the country are converts from the scheduled castes and lower middle castes and as such should be absorbed within OBC and SC categories with realistically expanded (separate) quota for Muslims within the these categories in order to insure that religious biases are not able to keep away Muslims from job reserved under caste categories.

Religion, like caste, is basic sociological reality of the country and till we are not able to implement diversity index through equal opportunity commission, the reservation should remain in force to ensure the justice and opportunities to diverse communities of the country.

TCN: What do you like to see Muslims as a community must do to help themselves?

I have already mentioned very encouraging trend in recent years among Muslims (and specifically among Muslim youth) towards politics, religious and gender issues. These positive trends/approach must continue. The education is base on which civilizations are made. It will be important to ensure that the younger generation of the community (both boys and girls) receive right kind of and quality education. Muslim community must keep communication channel open to all the political and meaningful organisations of the country and convey to them their rightful and constitutional demands, and desire to contribute to the development of the country. Another very important step should be to channelize the available resources of the community (like those from zakat, waqf income, and other contributions) to productive purposes and to the needy, besides encouraging those economically capable within and outside the community to contribute to the development of the community and in nation building process.

Congress and the BJP, tweedledum and tweedledee

$
0
0

By Saeed Naqvi, IANS,

Next Republic Day, four months before the 2014 general elections, when Gujarat Chief Minister and BJP’s Prime Ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, lays the base of Sardar Patel’s statue facing the Sardar Sarovar Dam on Narmada river, will the Congress party be present at the function? What is wrong with a great Congress leader, the country’s first home minister, unifier of the Indian state, being appropriated by the RSS-BJP? Maybe there is something common in the DNA of the Congress and the BJP. We are all Indians, after all.

The statue, to be completed in five years, will be the tallest in the world, twice the size of the Statue of Liberty. Heaven knows who will be prime minister then. If it is Narendra Modi, the ceremonies will be an extravaganza on a global scale. Will the Congress refuse to attend?

If, by a quirk of fortune, Rahul Gandhi finds himself in Race Course Road, will he complete the project begun by Narendra Modi? Or will he, in a spell of Nehruvian pique, abandon the Patel statue. Who knows, in his creative unpredictability, he may embark on an even taller Nehru statue.

He will not be allowed to by the party. The national mood, Rahul will be told, is more Patel than Nehru, which paraphrased means more saffron than secular. If it is a complicated transformation to communicate, let me try explaining. Imagine the Congress and the BJP on a stage as two puppets, holding hands and jigging, the accompanying song would be:

In form and feature, face and limb
I grew so like my brother.
That folks went taking me for him
And each for one another.

Patel may well be the perfect symbol of this synthesis. And Nehru? A discard? On which perch do we place, poor Maulana Azad who, with touching naivette, hankered for a united India which ironically RSS ideologue H.V. Seshadri also wanted?

When Nehru switched and supported the Partition plan, imagine the pain and bewilderment with which Maulana Azad must have looked at him. Et tu, Jawaharlal? Nehru was mesmerized by the Maulana’s intellect. In a letter to Indira Gandhi he describes him “too erudite”. The Maulana dedicated "India Wins Freedom" to “Jawaharlal Nehru, friend and comrade”. As Congress president from 1939 to 46 he successfully negotiated with the British Cabinet Mission and handed over to the party a plan for a united India. Who wrecked it? And we have arrived in this twilight between hard and soft saffron primarily under Congress rule.

This Patel debate is something that neither the Congress nor the BJP can be sanguine about. How does one square Modi’s admiration for Patel with the Tragic Story of Partition, by the RSS ideologue, H.V. Seshadri. He has taken both, Nehru and Patel, to task for having partitioned the country.

Seshadri wrote: “When the new Viceroy Lord Mountbatten announced on June 3, 1947, the plan for transfer of power, it came as a stunning blow to the people. For that plan, approved by Nehru and Patel, had envisaged cutting up Bharat and creating Pakistan! The great and trusted leaders of Congress had turned their backs on the sacred oaths they had taken, and the pledges they had administered to the people.”

If you are inclined to take the Seshadri version with a pinch of salt, let us read the version of someone who was present at the Congress conclaves in those fateful days: Ram Manohar Lohia. In his "Guilty Men of India’s Partition", he describes Nehru “throwing a fit”, when Lohia urged that Congress leaders should reject the Two-Nation theory. Did you know that Congress leaders had accepted the “Two-Nation” theory, that Hindus and Muslims constitute two nations? Why has the Congress not spelt it out ever? Everything would have fallen in place. Indian Muslims would not have been marginalized by deception; they would have been confronted for a bargain. And it may well have been a grand bargain. In Lohia’s version, Nehru was exasperated with “this continual harping on Hindu and Muslim being brothers or one nation, when they were at each other’s throat”. He described as “fantastic, this continual debate with Mr. Jinnah”.

Nehru smiled at Lohia’s quip: “As a results of the Civil war, had Americans from the north and the south ceased to be brothers and one nation?”

Lohia is something of a red herring for most congressmen. Let us, therefore consider the following version of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad: After Mahatma Gandhi’s assassination Jan 30, 1948, at Birla House, the home minister, Sardar Patel came under a scanner.

“At a meeting held in Delhi to express our sense of horror and sorrow at Gandhiji’s death, Jayaprakash Narayan said clearly that the home minister of India, Sardar Patel, could not escape responsibility for what had happened”. He sought an explanation. It was only when his colleagues had put him in the dock, that Patel ordered the arrest of RSS supremo Golwalkar.

After the bitter experience of the 1946 interim coalition government with the Muslim League, Sardar Patel became a “greater believer in the two-nation theory than even Jinnah”. The Maulana is unable to disguise his pain at his good friend Nehru, Patel and later even Gandhiji, accept the plan for partition, leaving him and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan twiddling their thumbs.

Little wonder the Muslim has many issues with the Congress. What has become of him in the 60 years of Congress rule, he was able to see in the mirror of the Sachar Committee Report in 2006. Why, he asks, does he hear the same slogan, riot after riot?

“Mussalman ke do sthan.
Qabristan ya Pakistan.”
(There are two places for the Muslim: the graveyard or Pakistan)

Is it because the Congress allowed the misapprehension to persist that the Muslim divided the country and then stayed on? If that were the case why have Seshadri, Lohia, Maulana Azad and scores of others taken the Congress to task as the Guilty Men of India’s Partition? Ofcourse, the BJP shouts the morbid slogan, but it is the Congress which created conditions over the past 66 years for that slogan to carry.

Is there a way out? Ofcourse there is. But first let us find the courage to discuss history.

(1.11.2013 - A senior commentator on political and diplomatic affairs, Saeed Naqvi can be reached on saeed.naqvi@hotmail.com)

Patel: Revisiting history

$
0
0

By Dr. Jilukara Sreenivas,

Constructing the images of the national leaders is a result of dominant politics. There are many instances to realize this political manufacturing of ideal leaders who worked for the country in the colonial period. In terms of G. Aloysius national movement is an amalgamation of power and brahmanical culture. Brahmanical politics had generated many upper caste leaders. National movement mainly led by Congress party has a number of brahmanical fanatic leaders. Mr. M.K. Gandhi openly declared himself as a Sanatan Hindu. He never felt ashamed in opposing civil and political rights for minorities in colonial rule. Nehru and Vallabhabai Patel never disobeyed the words of Mr. M.K.Gandhi. These three people colluded with Lord Mountbatten for partition of the country. But Modi and Manmohan Singh are jointly stating that Mr. Patel had fought for national integration. This is nothing but abusing the Indian history.

Vallabhabibai Patel, a kshatriya by caste, had never performed his efficiency and intellectuality.. He never supported Dr. Ambedkar who fought for separate electorate in association with Muslim League. Aga Khan and Dr. Ambedkar worked together during the time of round table conferences (1930-31). Mr. Patel opposed Dalits and Muslims when communal award was announced in 1932. He stood by the Gandhi's coercive fast. Across the Gujarat he campaigned against the civil rights of depressed classes and minorities at that crucial time. Patel was a land lord in Gujarat and he worked for his class interests. He was never interested in democratic values. He has no meaning for the equality, fraternity, and freedom for the downtrodden people. His undemocratic and fanatic attitude was revealed during the partition time.

Patel like Gandhi did not demand for independence. He asked colonial rulers for swaraj, complete swaraj/purna swaraj, and dominian status. These notions were formulated and propagated by Tilak and Gandhi. These three concepts do not mean independence or freedom but sharing the power with the colonial ruleers. Although Patel had no role in producing the new concepts and ideological categories, which became the chanting slogans for the congress followers in the struggle. Such an intellectually impotent man was Patel. How he will be the ideal for a learned society? Sharing the power through legislature and administration was a central theme for the different sections. Muslims had been awarded communal representation according to their population. Dr. Ambedkar had demanded colonial rulers to extend this scheme to the depressed classes. He had argued for adequate representation in legislature and education, and employment.

What was Patel’s stand? Oppressed people demands were denied by this so called steel man. He was antagonistic towards Muslims because they are enjoying communal representation. Muslims were politically independent and they were equal share holders in the power. This autonomous political behaviour of Muslims had caused irritation to the Gandhi, Patel and Nehru. Congress used to oppose the communal award for Muslims. This kind of attitude can be seen in the Nehru Report (1929) and in round table conferences. As a result of this hatred, political, educational and employment representation (reservation) had been dismissed for Muslims, Sikhs, OBCs and Indian Christians on 27-28 August, 1947. Patel had compelled Muslims to give away the constitutional rights guaranteed by the objective resolution of the constituent assembly. Patel introduced a resolution saying there will not be any kind of reservation for any section on the basis of religion, caste, and creed. Dr. Ambedkar did not accept this proposal. But all the Congress Muslim leaders accepted. Sole opponent to the social justice, Gandhi played a game by pushing Patel into the scene. It was the Patel and Gandhi who had rejected social justice for the Muslims and OBCs. Patel was a Manuwadi, he was not a Manavatavadi (Humanist).

Patel also opposed share in the power for the minorities, dalits, tribes and OBCs. Lord Wovell categorically announced an official statement saying Muslims, Hindus and Depressed Classes (SC, ST, BC) will have equal share in the power in Independent India. This statement has threatened Mr. Gandhi, Nehru and Patel. These three men agreed with the proposal of partition which was opposed by Muslim League in 1947. This truth is no where revealed. Modi is now chanting that Patel was a national integrationist. What a political drama!

Patel is picturized as a steel man. So Modi wants to install a largest steel statue for him. This is ridiculous. Patel was an ordinary foot soldier of Mr. Gandhi. He did not protect Muslims after partition. He was completely inefficient in handling the complicated situations. He is a symbol of hatred and violence. Patel can never be an ideal on the national scene.

Surprising thing is that Mr. Patel is a congress man. Modi is a BJP war monger. Modi is no where connected with Patel politics. But Modi is claiming Patel as a national hero like him. Congress Party is not interested in Patel from the national movement time. It has abandoned him long back. As Gujarat pride, Modi appropriated Patel who was a week man in the critical times. Congress and Modi both are playing games to fool the country. Modi may search his self/soul in the steel statue of Patel, but definitely he will learn a good lesson from the history.

--
Dr. Jilukara Sreenivas is associated with Dalit Shakti Programme (DSP)

Congress and the BJP, tweedledum and tweedledee

$
0
0

By Saeed Naqvi, iANS

Next Republic Day, four months before the 2014 general elections, when Gujarat Chief Minister and BJP's Prime Ministerial candidate, Narendra Modi, lays the base of Sardar Patel's statue facing the Sardar Sarovar Dam on Narmada river, will the Congress party be present at the function? What is wrong with a great Congress leader, the country's first home minister, unifier of the Indian state, being appropriated by the RSS-BJP? Maybe there is something common in the DNA of the Congress and the BJP. We are all Indians, after all.

The statue, to be completed in five years, will be the tallest in the world, twice the size of the Statue of Liberty. Heaven knows who will be prime minister then. If it is Narendra Modi, the ceremonies will be an extravaganza on a global scale. Will the Congress refuse to attend?

If, by a quirk of fortune, Rahul Gandhi finds himself in Race Course Road, will he complete the project begun by Narendra Modi? Or will he, in a spell of Nehruvian pique, abandon the Patel statue. Who knows, in his creative unpredictability, he may embark on an even taller Nehru statue.

He will not be allowed to by the party. The national mood, Rahul will be told, is more Patel than Nehru, which paraphrased means more saffron than secular. If it is a complicated transformation to communicate, let me try explaining. Imagine the Congress and the BJP on a stage as two puppets, holding hands and jigging, the accompanying song would be:

In form and feature, face and limb
I grew so like my brother.
That folks went taking me for him
And each for one another.

Patel may well be the perfect symbol of this synthesis. And Nehru? A discard? On which perch do we place, poor Maulana Azad who, with touching naivette, hankered for a united India which ironically RSS ideologue H.V. Seshadri also wanted?

When Nehru switched and supported the Partition plan, imagine the pain and bewilderment with which Maulana Azad must have looked at him. Et tu, Jawaharlal? Nehru was mesmerized by the Maulana's intellect. In a letter to Indira Gandhi he describes him "too erudite." The Maulana dedicated "India Wins Freedom" to "Jawaharlal Nehru, friend and comrade." As Congress president from 1939 to 46 he successfully negotiated with the British Cabinet Mission and handed over to the party a plan for a united India. Who wrecked it? And we have arrived in this twilight between hard and soft saffron primarily under Congress rule.

This Patel debate is something that neither the Congress nor the BJP can be sanguine about. How does one square Modi's admiration for Patel with the Tragic Story of Partition, by the RSS ideologue, H.V. Seshadri. He has taken both, Nehru and Patel, to task for having partitioned the country.

Seshadri wrote: "When the new Viceroy Lord Mountbatten announced on June 3, 1947, the plan for transfer of power, it came as a stunning blow to the people. For that plan, approved by Nehru and Patel, had envisaged cutting up Bharat and creating Pakistan! The great and trusted leaders of Congress had turned their backs on the sacred oaths they had taken, and the pledges they had administered to the people."

If you are inclined to take the Seshadri version with a pinch of salt, let us read the version of someone who was present at the Congress conclaves in those fateful days: Ram Manohar Lohia. In his "Guilty Men of India's Partition", he describes Nehru 'throwing a fit', when Lohia urged that Congress leaders should reject the Two-Nation theory. Did you know that Congress leaders had accepted the 'Two-Nation' theory, that Hindus and Muslims constitute two nations? Why has the Congress not spelt it out ever? Everything would have fallen in place. Indian Muslims would not have been marginalized by deception; they would have been confronted for a bargain. And it may well have been a grand bargain. In Lohia's version, Nehru was exasperated with 'this continual harping on Hindu and Muslim being brothers or one nation, when they were at each other's throat.'. He described as 'fantastic, this continual debate with Mr. Jinnah'.

Nehru smiled at Lohia's quip: 'As a results of the Civil war, had Americans from the north and the south ceased to be brothers and one nation?'

Lohia is something of a red herring for most congressmen. Let us, therefore consider the following version of Maulana Abul Kalam Azad: After Mahatma Gandhi's assassination Jan 30, 1948, at Birla House, the home minister, Sardar Patel came under a scanner.

'At a meeting held in Delhi to express our sense of horror and sorrow at Gandhiji's death, Jayaprakash Narayan said clearly that the home minister of India, Sardar Patel, could not escape responsibility for what had happened'. He sought an explanation. It was only when his colleagues had put him in the dock, that Patel ordered the arrest of RSS supremo Golwalkar.

After the bitter experience of the 1946 interim coalition government with the Muslim League, Sardar Patel became a 'greater believer in the two-nation theory than even Jinnah'. The Maulana is unable to disguise his pain at his good friend Nehru, Patel and later even Gandhiji, accept the plan for partition, leaving him and Khan Abdul Ghaffar Khan twiddling their thumbs.

Little wonder the Muslim has many issues with the Congress. What has become of him in the 60 years of Congress rule, he was able to see in the mirror of the Sachar Committee Report in 2006. Why, he asks, does he hear the same slogan, riot after riot?

'Mussalman ke do sthan.
Qabristan ya Pakistan.'
(There are two places for the Muslim: the graveyard or Pakistan)

Is it because the Congress allowed the misapprehension to persist that the Muslim divided the country and then stayed on? If that were the case why have Seshadri, Lohia, Maulana Azad and scores of others taken the Congress to task as the Guilty Men of India's Partition? Ofcourse, the BJP shouts the morbid slogan, but it is the Congress which created conditions over the past 66 years for that slogan to carry.

Is there a way out? Of course there is. But first let us find the courage to discuss history.

---
A senior commentator on political and diplomatic affairs, Saeed Naqvi can be reached on saeed.naqvi@hotmail.com)

Winning friends and allies: Congress has an edge

$
0
0

By Amulya Ganguli, IANS,

In terms of numbers, the show was impressive enough. As many as 14 parties participated in the convention of non-Congress and non-BJP parties organised by the Left in Delhi on Wednesday.

Arguably, their prime target was the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), since the objective of the meeting was to mobilise the people against communalism. Since this is a taint of which the BJP is often accused, it can be claimed that the organisers felt that the BJP was a bigger enemy than the Congress.

The presence of Bihar Chief Minister Nitish Kumar, currently one of the staunchest critics of the BJP, at the meeting confirmed its political orientation. There were a few other straws in the wind. One was that the AIADMK sent an emissary. Since the conventional wisdom is that its leader, Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, is closer to the BJP than to the Congress, the presence of the visitor from Chennai is a sign that the mercurial lady is keeping her options open.

However, another mercurial leader, West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee, was conspicuous by her absence, evidently because of the mutual antipathy between the Left and her. A similar antipathy between the Samajwadi Party and the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) kept another formidable lady, former Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mayawati, away from the show.

Such aversions indicate how difficult it will be for the participants to coalesce into a viable alternative to the Congress and the BJP. It is not surprising, therefore, that they firmly discounted any such possibility while insisting that their present focus is only on fighting communalism.

All that can be said for the moment, therefore, is that the Left has played the Third Front card again - the last time that the comrades had done so was before the 2009 general election - but without any fanfare, since neither the communists nor those present at the meeting can expect to initiate a political movement which will give sleepless nights to the two major national parties.

The Left will, however, be pleased that after a longish interval following its defeats in West Bengal and Kerala in 2011, it is edging back into the limelight. While its initiative may seem to be a case of whistling in the dark, it is also true that, inchoate as the formation is, the parties which attended the meeting - along with others which didn't, such as the BSP and the Trinamool Congress - can expect to win 20-30 Lok Sabha seats more than their 2009 tally of 220.

It goes without saying that if there was no ill-feeling among the constituents, this group would have been in a position to form a government. But this isn't possible in a situation where not only are some of the parties at loggerheads in the states which are their strongholds but also that their leaders have highly inflated egos, which will prevent them from working in concert with others.

A scenario where Jayalalitha will agree to play second fiddle to Mamata Banerjee or Mayawati, or vice versa, is unthinkable. There is speculation, therefore, that the participation of the Nationalist Congress Party (NCP), an ally of the Congress, at the meeting indicates that union Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar is testing the waters since, as a senior leader, he may be acceptable to the prima donnas. His expressed disinclination to work under Rahul Gandhi is another marker on the road to power.

However, there is another difficulty. While the communists will want the group to follow their anti-American and anti-market line, neither Pawar nor the Biju Janata Dal's (BJD) Naveen Patnaik is likely to follow it.

What is likely to ensue, therefore, is a tug-of-war between the Congress and the BJP to win over as many of these parties as they can. As is obvious, the party with the largest number of Lok Sabha seats - which will in all probability be the BJP - will be at an advantage, for it will be closer to the finishing line and will expect to cross it with the help of a few friends.

But the BJP's concern will be whether the Narendra Modi factor will be an inhibiting element. It is worth noting that for all the hype which the Gujarat chief minister is generating, only the Telugu Desam has indicated its willingness to join him. Others have been hedging their bets, like the AIADMK, Babulal Marandi's Jharkhand Vikas Morcha and Jagan Mohan Reddy of the YSR Congress in Andhra Pradesh.

The BJP also cannot but take note of the fact that a large number of parties - 14 plus BSP, Trinamool and others - is against it, some of them quite virulently, like the four Leftist parties, the Janata Dal (United), the Samajwadi Party, the Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD), the Lok Janashakti Party of Ramvilas Paswan, and others.

The political battlefield, therefore, will be quite messy both before and after next year's general election. But the Congress, with its secular pretensions, may gain more from the cluttered scene than the BJP.

(02-11-2013-Amulya Ganguli is a political analyst. He can be reached at amulyaganguli@gmail.com)


'They are in jail because they wear a Kurta, sport a beard and keep a Quran at home'

$
0
0

By Shaik Zakeer Hussain, TwoCircles.net,

Bangalore: When a low intensity bomb exploded on April 17, about 100 meters away from the Karnataka BJP headquarter in Malleswaram, Bangalore, the incident was termed an act of terror and eventually ended up in the arrest of 11 suspects, all belonging to the Muslim community.

Six months later, the First Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate’s Court, ordered the release of three persons arrested by the police in the case. Peer Mohideen, Saddam Hussain and Tenkasi Haneefa were discharged from the charges. While Mohideen was released on Tuesday, Hussain and Haneefa will be handed over to the Tamil Nadu police, for their alleged role in another case.

In this Interview with TCN’S Shaik Zakeer Hussain, S. Balan, the lawyer for the acquitted, talks on the whole trial.



Advocate S. Balan.

Three of the accused you represented were discharged of the alleged terror charges against them, are you happy with the outcome?

This is not the question of being happy, this outcome proves that a particular community is blamed or projected as terrorists. Their cases were dropped, because the investigating agencies could not collect any material against them.

What was the prima facie behind the arrests of Peer Mohideen and other accused in this case?

There wasn't any. Whenever a blast takes place, the agencies proceed in a certain direction, there is a particular modus operandi or pattern behind these types of cases. In 2008 blast case for instance, they (investigative agencies) concentrated mainly on the Malayalam speaking Muslims, especially from Ernakulam - Kochi area and now in this case, they have targeted the Tamil speaking Muslims.

Muslims who are either engaged in helping the victims of state terrorism or are involved in any socio-economic activities directed towards uplifting their community, are being targeted. Peer Mohideen, Saddam Hussain and Tenkasi Haneefa were subjected to third degree torture and forced confessions, their ordeal continued for six months and despite that, the police could not fit them in any angle and had to let them out of the charge sheet.

The only evidence against them was, that they were Muslims and the corroborating evidence was that they were involved in some social activities. So, whoever tries to help their community in anyway, are termed as terrorists.



The blast site at Malleshwaram, Bengaluru (TCN File Photo).

How do individuals, who are absolutely innocent, get framed in such cases?

What happens, is if any of their family members or friends were accused in any case, for instance here, a lot of them, had some of their friends or relatives, who were accused in the 1993 Coimbatore blast case; let me emphasize this, accused not convicted, so there was a familial link established, because of which they got framed.

This is not the first time that a person arrested on charges of alleged terrorism, was released for lack of evidence, do you think, there is a deliberate attempt to frame people in such cases?

For the fascist forces to militarize a society, they need to blame a particular community and in India, they blame the Muslims. Even during the colonial rule, they never fought the British, but targeted Muslims instead. Today, war on terror, is a world phenomenon and though it is an American framework, the Indian fascists and corporates also follow the same pattern.

When India's gates were opened for free market economics, it also opened gates for the communalisation of society, so in India, the fascists and corporates coincide. The judiciary, the administration and legislature are already communalised and communal elements occupy every area of power. It's the same situation with the investigative agencies, they are overtly and covertly communalised.

However, having said that, let me also point out that, it is not just Muslims, who are the targets here. For 2000 years, they have targeted Dalits, they targeted people belonging to the backward classes, in Kandhamal, they targeted Christians and they did the same thing in Mangalore and North Indian states. Basically, they are against anyone is against their ideology.

What is the status of other accused in this case, do you think they are innocents too?

The FIR filed by the agencies suggests that, a pipe bomb was used, which was fitted to a two-wheeler and triggered by a SIM card and there was a terrorist, anti-national organisation behind it. Now, what is the nexus between the accused and that organisation, where was the bomb procured from, where was it manufactured, who brought it, who planted it, who triggered it, whether it was actually triggered by a SIM card or any other detonator has not been concluded. The blast happened near the BJP office and not in front of it, so the motive behind the blast is also not forthcoming.

The Malegoan blast was initially blamed on some Muslim organisations, later we came to know, that it was the handiwork of Saffron terror groups. Same thing happened in the Mecca masjid case, the Ajmer case and with the Samjhauta Express blast case. In the Coimbatore blast case as well, several members of the minority community were arrested, ultimately when the case was transferred to CB-CID of Tamil Nadu, they found that they were innocent, and an officer by name Rathna Sabapathy, who was known to have Saffron leniency, was found to have framed them wrongfully.

They are in jail because they wear a Kurta, they sport a beard, they wear a topi, they have no moustache, they keep a Quran at home and they were helping people from the minority community in their socio-economic and legal needs. So, these are the materials, everything else is assumptions and presumptions.



BJP state Headquarter.

What do you have to say about the reporting of this case and other such cases in the media?

The mainstream media is pro-establishment, they just vomit what the establishment says. The media is also a part of the war on minorities, unleashed by the government. They are run by corporates, so it is naturally anti-minorities.

How do you think, we as a society should respond to such institutionalized injustice? Surprisingly, there is little outrage.

The society should react, but they are not, people are playing the role of only mute spectators here. Progressive minds, who feel that the whole planet should live together in harmony, should fight these elements.

Related:

Low intensity blast injures 16 in Bengaluru

Bengaluru blast: Innocent Muslims implicated, says NCHRO report

NCHRO fact-finding report on Bengaluru blast 2013

Dilemma of Indian Muslims after partition

$
0
0

By Yasmin Qureshi

Abbu’s family, like many other Muslims in India was torn between staying in their ancestral land and going to the new country founded for Muslims. The call for Pakistan and the Muslim League movement was more prominent in the elite or educated classes. For Abbu’s family it was a distant idea and life outside Dilli was inconceivable. But the partition wave didn’t leave them untouched and a few family members including Abbu migrated to Lahore. Lahore was chosen because they had heard it was similar to Dilli. A year in Lahore was enough for them to realize their heart was still in Dilli. Ghalib ki galiyan, echoes of azaans from Jama Masjid, pigeons flying above their roofs and the aroma of korma brought them back to the home their father had built.



Jama Masjid of Delhi. [TCN Photo]

The conflict of choosing between the newly founded nation states of India and Pakistan divided many families. Some of Abbu’s relatives shuffled between the two for many years till they were forced to make a choice by the governments in the 1960s. His elder sister’s family and a few other nieces and nephews decided to become Pakistani citizens.

For Muslims that stayed in India, the next few decades were years of fear and subjugation. Communal violence, often organized and manufactured by political parties or the right wing Hindu organization, RSS throughout the 1960s in cities where Muslims were in large numbers was a threatening message to the Muslims that if they choose to stay here they would have to live as a silenced minority with a constant reminder they were guilty of dividing India.

Discrimination in jobs and bloody riots led many Muslims to change their mind and migrate to Pakistan in the 50s and 60s. Ammi’s family was one of them. Her two brothers and mother migrated in the 1960s leaving her and her sister, both of who were married, behind. Due to visa restrictions and wars between the two countries Ammi wasn’t able to meet her mother (my nanni) for 15 years. Memories of Nanni’s first visit to India in the mid 70s are still vivid in my mind.

Due to frequent riots, Muslims often traveled in trains with changed names. Ammi recalls an incidence when she was traveling from Aligarh to Bombay in the 60s for her new job. A Punjabi lady in her compartment was very affectionate, sharing food and stories. After a few hours she asked Ammi her name. She didn’t speak for the rest of the journey. The lady’s family had been uprooted from their home in Gujranwala during partition. My mother’s Muslim name had brought back memories of the brutal violence she had witnessed in her hometown, now part of Pakistan.

When Ammi woke up in the morning she noticed the lady had covered her with a blanket.

Migration of many intellectuals and educated Muslims left a vacuum in Muslim leadership in India. Over the next few decades, the community became more marginalized and weak. It was safer to live in a Muslim ghetto than a mixed society. Education was poor and few could rise to prominent positions.

Abbu was the first person in his muhallah to go oversees for higher education and his galli neighbors still remember the decorations and celebrations to welcome him on his return from the US in the mid 60s. He was amongst some of the most prominent geophysicists of his times. He contributed significantly to the field of science and technology but an incidence created a deep wound in his heart never to be healed. He was leading an expedition of scientists in the Himalaya. After a point in the high mountains near the Pakistan border, everyone from this team except him was allowed to go further. On questioning why he was stopped but not any of his students, cook or driver, he was informed it was because he was a Muslim.

Throughout his life Abbu struggled with his Indian nationality and Muslim identity. He often recalled with great fervor how he along with his family and friends had gone to Lal Qila (Red Fort) to hear Nehru’s ‘Freedom at Midnight’ speech sitting on his elder brother’s shoulders. Maulana Azad too was an inspiration for him, both from a religious and educational perspective. His speech at Jama Masjid in 1948 addressed to the Indian Muslims predicting the challenges the new state of Pakistan would face in coming years due to regional identities, emphasizing that the new state would not solve the problems facing Indian Muslim left a lasting impression on Abbu and played a key role in deciding to stay in India.

An admirer of Allama Iqbal, Abbu was against the feudal and aristocratic foundation of Pakistan but in the next few decades he would often show disappointment at the continuation of the elite class rule in India and the privileges Nawabs and Rajas(who in his opinion participated little to nothing in the freedom movement) enjoyed.



The then President of India Pratibha Patil performing Puja to inaugurate first VVIP Business Boeing Jet flight at Air Force Station Palam in New Delhi on April 1, 2009

Although India was established as a secular country, Hindu culture’s dominance was evident with Bhoomi Pooja and Aarti being performed at government functions. Abbu raised an objection to the organizers in his office a few times, only to be questioned about his nationalism. Muslim faith to Abbu meant being part of the Umma (global Muslim community) irrespective of national boundaries and bowing only to Allah. But Indian nationalism often demanded submission to ‘Mother India’.

He loved the land he was born and chose to live in but his religion was just as important to him. Sadly the country he envisioned in his youth with socialistic ideals of communal harmony, equality and justice for all continued to be an unfulfilled dream.

We were glad during his last years the massive stroke he had suffered didn’t allow him to comprehend the horrors unleashed by the pogrom in Gujarat in 2002 or the occupation of Afghanistan and Iraq post 911. His mind had become like a child, devoid of absorbing or understanding such human atrocities that would have disturbed him tremendously.

--
Yasmin Qureshi is a social justice activist and writer based in the bay area, California. Her work includes US wars in the Middle East, impact of global militarization and drone warfare, people’s resistance movements in places like Palestine and Kashmir. Her essay, The Militarization of India was published in Counter Punch in May 2011. Excerpts from this essay were read at an event organized by the Partition Archives project in Berkeley earlier this year. This article was first published on Kafila.org

Tendulkar is much more than strokeplay and statistics

$
0
0

By Veturi Srivatsa, IANS,

Sachin Tendulkar is on the home stretch, playing his last two Test matches of an amazing career spanning almost a quarter century. Not many legends may have had the luxury of a farewell he is rightly receiving, though quite a few stalwarts like him chose their place and time to bow out of international cricket.

There is no better pastime than discussing the future of the game and the team whenever a great player quits. Mercifully, the question "who after Sachin" remains a murmur, not a hysterical wailing. Instead the talk is which of the youngsters in the Indian team is likely to get closer to some of Tendulkar's innumerable records, if ever they do.

The initial indication is that Virat Kohli can leave the great man behind in at least One-Day cricket, in the number of hundreds and aggregate much faster, but the rider is if the Delhi young man scores his runs at the frenetic pace he is getting now.

There is no talk on the opening slot in the One-Day format he vacated a year ago. Within no time the replacement was found, not one but two who have done a lot better than all Tendulkar and his partners did to start with at the top.

As for his No. 4 position in the Test batting order, Kohli should take it now, that Rahul Dravid's one-drop slot has been taken by Cheteshwar Pujara. So, technically, in both the forms of cricket the selectors have been able to find batsmen who will make him feel that the future of Indian cricket is in good hands as he walks off the ground one last time.

Is that all for Tendulkar? It would be naive to make things so simple. Tendulkar is much more than mere strokeplay and statistics. The pleasure he has provided to the fans the world over cannot be measured in compartmental terms of his batting style and the tons of runs he scored.

Tendulkar is an impact player, not by his batting alone. If his presence in his dressing room created that confidence among his teammates, in the rival dressing room his very sight made them nervy. Look at the generations of players he has played with and how many of them still swear by his name for prolonging their careers by making course corrections thanks to tips he unselfishly offered them. That's a great quality in him.

There have been great teams that represented India after he made his debut and he was a constant factor in all of them. He named at least three teams as best he has played in over the years.

His first pat was for Azharuddin's 1992 team that outclassed the Australians under Mark Taylor. Then came a phase where he thought under Sourav Ganguly the team has blossomed and finally under Mahendra Singh Dhoni he thought he saw the best.

Tendulkar's own contribution to the rise of these teams was immense, and no wonder he has never feared of getting dropped on performance and he has never been kept out of the team on cricketing grounds. Not many cricketers can claim such invincibility.

He has plenty to offer to Indian cricket and some of his interviews have revealed an insight into his approach to keep Indian cricket flourishing. He has definite ideas about junior cricket and how to groom players. Some of his contemporaries have also talked on the subject, but somehow could not get the required push to implement them. The Indian board will do well to pick his brains and make the pipeline more effective.

The motto of the Indian team should be a remarkable quote of his: Every time India wins, individual delight wanes before the team's celebration. The line sums up his cricket philosophy and it should be highlighted in every Indian dressing room to inspire the future generations of cricketers.

(05-11-2013 - Veturi Srivatsa is the sports editor of IANS. The views expressed are personal. He can be contacted at v.srivatsa@ians.in)

JTSA report points to ‘judicial abdication,’ lists 77 cases of ‘guilt by association’ of Muslim youths in MP

$
0
0

By TwoCircles.net Staff Reporter,

New Delhi: A new report by the Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Association (JTSA) documents the cases of ‘Guilt by Association’ of arbitrary detentions under the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) from Madhya Pradesh, despite the fact that there has been no incidents of terror attacks in the state.

For a state with such a history, the number of cases in which the accused were charged with furthering the activities of an unlawful association under UAPA is fairly high. Cases are registered against former SIMI members, their friends and acquaintances – and sometimes people with no links to either SIMI when it was a lawful association, or any of its former members – in police stations in Indore, Seoni, Khandwa, Bhopal, Burhanpur, Ujjain, Neemuch, Guna etc, practically the entire state.



One arrest but six others are affected too. Mohammad Sajid's family struggling to survive in Ujjain.

JTSA is going to release the report ‘Guilt by Association’ on November 7, Thursday at 2 PM at the FTK-CIT Auditorium of Jamia Millia Islamia. The report illustrates why the short cut methods of special or fast track courts, currently under discussion even in the Home Ministry, will not help as the malaise is deeper and more fundamental.

“The existence of laws like UAPA, which render entire communities perpetually suspect, make malicious and biased investigation that much easier,” a statement by the JTSA noted.

Passed in 1967, and amended repeatedly, in 1972, 2004, 2008, and yet again in 2012, the anti terror legislation, Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), grants the Centre the power to declare an association as “unlawful” if it is seen as a threat or a potential threat to the country’s “sovereignty and integrity”, or is seen as promoting “enmity between different groups” or for “imputations prejudicial to national integration”.

Though there is no all-India audit yet of UAPA cases, more and more evidence is surfacing about the extensive abuse of anti-terror laws in targeting minorities, tribals, deprived sections as well as political activists. UAPA seems to be following the trajectory of earlier anti-terror laws such as POTA and TADA, which were documented to have been used extensively to target minorities (among others).

At the heart of the UAPA legislation are two issues: membership (of unlawful organizations) and conspiracy (of furthering the activities of the unlawful organization). Both, membership to an organization that no longer exists legally, and nebulous charges of furthering the activities of such an organization are notoriously difficult to pin down. In most cases, the only ‘proof’ that the investigating agency is able to demonstrate is to associate the accused to a proscribed organization and his or her participation in unlawful acts is inferred through the alleged recovery of banned and seditious literature from the custody of the accused.

Examples of cases from MP:

FIR No. 537/00 and FIR No. 663/00 were registered in Police stations Taliya and Shahzanabad respectively on 22nd October 2000 against the same set of accused: (1) Sorab Ahmed (2) Maulana Arsad Ilyas ahtesham (3) Abdul Razzaq (4) Mohd. Aleem (5) Muneer Uz Zama Deshmukh (6) Khalid Naim. The six were accused of pasting provocative posters. The six then appeared in many other FIRs filed in the two thanas in various combinations and permutations.

In other cases, it appears that old FIRs are brought out, the files dusted and the facts of the case simply copied on to a new FIR. The FIR No. 101/08 in which the accused Aman was screaming slogans in favour of SIMI at the Sarvate Bus station when the police apprehended him is an exact replica of FIR No. 251/01, a case registered the day after SIMI was banned.

In some cases, the evidence of guilt is identical: for example, the same copy of a magazine has been produced in at least 4 different cases across the state. The same receipt of contribution to SIMI funds has been produced as evidence in two different cases. Both cases ended in conviction, despite clear indication of concocted evidence!



Mere possession of news items pertaining to SIMI has been turned into incriminating evidence (For example, FIR No. 467/ 01, PS Kotwali, Khandwa).

The JTSA reports wonders, “Perhaps the Madhya Pradesh police should explain if it was unlawful for the newspapers to publish reports of arrests of alleged SIMI activists; if it was unlawful to read those news items once published. How then could possession of these news clippings be construed as evidence of unlawful activity (even if you grant that these news clippings were actually in the possession of the accused)?”

Domino effect: The Pithampur case of Dhar (FIR no. 120/2008), one of the most prominent SIMI cases of Madhya Pradesh is also significant in that it set off a chain reaction resulting in the registration of near identical cases across the state. Arrests of 13 leading SIMI activists were allegedly made on 27 March 2008. Immediately after the arrests, on 29 March 2008, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Dhar, shot off letters to various districts of Madhya Pradesh asking for registration of similar cases. These letters immediately set of a chain reaction, resulting in 18 cases within one month, and another four over next six months.

Some of the accused arrested in the Peethumpur case – Safdar Nagori, Hafiz Hussain, Amil Parvez, Shivli, Kamruddin, Kamran and Ahmad Baig – were then implicated in different cases across the country, including in the Ahmedabad serial blasts case of 2008, despite the fact that they were in jail at that time.

The JTSA report asks, “If they were involved in the conspiracy of the blasts, it is for the government to explain how they participated in the conspiracy whilst in jail. This is nonetheless the way in which UAPA works, almost by association.”

It is impossible to see these large number of cases registered as divorced from the continuation of the ban on SIMI. These cases validate the extension of the ban; the ban legitimizes the witch-hunt in the name of combating the ‘terrorist organization’ creating a vicious circle. Under UAPA, the ban on an unlawful association is required to be reviewed every two years by a tribunal.
SIMI Tribunals are headed by a judge of the Delhi High Court. Barring 2008 when Justice Geeta Mittal revoked the ban citing the scarcity of evidence and facts – as opposed to the plenitude of allegations – against the organization, every single tribunal (2002, 2004, 2006, 2010 and 2012) has continued the ban.

The JTSA report adds, “The endless extension of the ban on SIMI and the large number of SIMI cases are intimately related to each other. The ban is extended citing the large number of ‘SIMI’ cases, and Muslim youth are arrested and charged for being members of SIMI on flimsy grounds. It is a tragic tautology that has played out for the past decade and more.”

Judicial Abdication:

The JTSA reports also questions the dubious ‘judicial abdication’ in allowing this witch-hunt by ignoring violation of procedural norms by the police, by lowering the burden of proof, by overlooking the fact the incriminating literature predates the ban on the organization, and by ignoring the obvious contradictions, to hand out conviction after conviction.

“The frivolous nature as well as the number of cases should have alerted the judiciary to the scale of frame-ups that the police was indulging in. And yet, the judiciary, which should have acted as a bulwark against this, is abdicating its responsibility,” it points out.

The number of convictions handed out on very spurious grounds compounds the number of cases registered. Take for instance, State versus Irfan (FIR No. 251/01, PS Gwaltoli, Indore). The prosecution case was that, on the intervening night of 27-28 September 2001 (the day SIMI was banned) at 12.15, Irfan was pasting posters of the banned organization SIMI on pillar number 14 of the Sarvate bus stand (Indore). He was screaming that though the government had banned SIMI, he would continue to be its member. His antics attracted a crowd. He was arrested and charged with Section 10 of UAPA. The prosecution presented seven witnesses. Of these, three were police witnesses, including the Investigating officer; two were from the ministry of Home who confirmed the signatures of the authority who granted the sanction for prosecution under UAPA. The only two independent witnesses – Chandar and Rajesh – denied the police story totally.



An expert witness testified that the Urdu literature seized contained nothing against the state or society, and in fact only consisted of veneration of God. It was also accepted by the prosecution that there was nothing against the state in the seized material.

The court convicted Irfan under section 10 of the UAPA, sentencing him to two years of imprisonment and Rs 500 as fine because the police witnesses has testified that they had seen the accused pasting SIMI posters and propagating the banned organization SIMI.

Number of cases registered:

Alirajpur: 1, Bhopal: 16, Burhanpur: 2, Dhar:1, Guna:4, Indore:25, Jabalpur:8, Khandwa:5, Mandsaur:1, Narsinghpur:1, Narsinghgadh (District Rajgadh):1, Neemuch:3, Sehore:1, Seoni:3, Shajapur:3, Ujjain:2.

About JTSA:

Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Association (originally Jamia Teachers’ Solidarity Group) is a collective of university teachers, formed in the aftermath of the Batla House ‘encounter’ in 2008. Though initially focusing on the demand for a judicial probe into the Batla House ‘encounter’, JTSA has emerged as an important voice arguing for rule of law, and against illegal detentions, encounter killings, and communal witch hunts by anti-terror agencies.

JTSA conducts fact-findings, investigations, publishes reports, engages in legal aid work as well as collaborates with a range of civil society groups on issues of democracy, justice and civil rights. For more on the activities of JTSA, visit www.teacherssolidarity.org

JTSA is a non-funded organization which depends on the goodwill, support of all democratic and progressive forces and individuals who would like to see our work to go on.

Related:
Unheard & Unspoken: Terror stories from Madhya Pradesh

[TCN FILE PHOTOS]

Muslim education in North-Eeast India: issues, challenges and strategies

$
0
0

By Maqbool Ahmed Siraj,

Educating a backward minority is a Herculean task. Muslims began thinking of modern education only around 1970. Today when the Information Technology, liberalization and globalization have begun to change the shape of the world, we are rubbing our eyes in disbelief over the strides made by erstwhile backward communities who have marched much ahead of Muslims, the rulers of yore. All this while Muslims had meticulously kept the mythical refrain of education having nothing to do with economy. But the world has asserted in totally unambiguous terms that affluence and influence are both inevitably linked to knowledge and people refusing to see this reality will have to pay a price in terms of economic well being as well as their rating in the powerful nations.

As a writer on Muslim development issue, I feel the Muslim educational planners should look at the following points:

An Overview of Muslim Situation in West Bengal and Assam

Muslims in West Bengal & Assam are least urbanized i.e., only 16.8% in West Bengal and 6.4% in Assam live in urban areas.

Literacy level: Muslims had 57% literacy against general 68.6% in WB. In Assam, Muslims were 48% literate against 63.3% among general population.

Mean Years of Schooling (MYS): Sachar Committee Reports had put West Bengal and Uttar Pradesh as states where MYS (for how many years a Muslim child of 7-16 years attended a school) as the least i.e., 2.84 years in West Bengal and 2.64 years. Muslim children were among those whose average years of attendance in schools was the least.

General Enrolment Ratio (GER)}: The report mentions GER among Muslims children of 6-14 years group in West Bengal being 82% as against 85.7% among the general populace. This is a heartening feature. Even in Assam it was 87% against 90 in general population.

Percentage of Matriculates: In the general population there were 38% people in West Bengal had completed matriculation in 2001. But among Muslims this figure stood at 11.9%. Among SCs and STs this percentage was 13%. The Reports has not mentioned these figures regarding Assam.

Percentage of Graduates: Among the general population 13% people were graduates while this figure for Muslims in West Bengal was around 2%.

Share of Muslim in State Employees: Muslims constitute 25.2% of state’s population while there were only 134,972 Muslim employees in the Government who represent only 2.1%. In Assam, Muslims constitute 30% of the state’s population while their share among government employees was 11.2%.

Put First things First Muslims should go for Mass enrolment of kids and checking dropouts

Muslims should not opt for top-down approach but rather should begin from the first baby step of setting up quality schools. A Muslim university here and an IAS coaching academy there may be fanciful idea, quite pleasing to the ear. But the work should start from basic institutions.

Care should be taken to enroll all children in whatever schools are available, and retaining them there for maximum period. This may entail organizing scholarships, transport facilities, midday meals or hostels. Charities should be channeled for these purposes. Pressure should be brought upon authorities to set up govt schools in Muslim habitations.

Schools run by Muslims should get affiliated to existing state education/examination boards and universities and follow their syllabus. Universities or boards flaunting word ‘Muslim’ are likely to serve as a stigma in the current atmosphere of bias and discrimination. Mega ventures are still not the Muslims’ cup of tea. While deficient resources are just one factor, the community clearly lacks serious academic approach essential for laying down strict norms for recruitment, evaluation and designing curriculum. While the ones already established by Muslims should continue, the new universities being set up by Muslims should adopt secular names. Apprenticeship in running colleges is essential before the community opts for setting up universities.

Education must not be Islamized

‘Islamization’ should neither be attempted nor demanded. It is simply suicidal. When we Islamize education, we also lend legitimacy to those who are out to saffronise the curriculum. They can very well ask, “when a minority is free to Islamize their schools, why not the majority saffronise their schools?” A better way to express the need for culturally sensitive curriculum is to say that ‘Privately managed Muslim schools should also provide for Islamic education up to a certain standard’. It should not be demanded in the state-run schools. And a curriculum on Islam should be informed and inspired with rationale and reasoning. Sometimes, the Islamisation takes very awful form. In a Muslim school the children were taught that Prophet Muhammad was the first man in space. Obviously, the teacher was trying to explain the Holy Prophet’s Meraj to heavens in contemporary scientific terms. They were dissuaded from doing so when a parent pointed out that Prophet Adam and his wife Eve (Hawwa) came down from heaven and Prophet Jesus was lifted to heavens and should thus be considered men (or woman) in space prior to the Holy Prophet.

Yes, Mother tongue is the best medium
But, kids are rapid learners of any language

Mother tongue is universally acknowledged as the best medium of education in early stages. If there is a sizeable section of Urdu speaking people in a ward or area, it is better to have Urdu medium schools upto 7th standard. But beyond this the community should enable the students to switch over to regional language medium or English.

Unavailability of Urdu medium schools should not be an excuse to keep away kids from schools. They must be sent to schools in whatever medium is available. Kids must be sent to school rather than be taught at home. Schools inculcate societal norms in them and kids are rapid learners of all languages.
Often Urdu medium is demanded for three principal reasons:

1-Culturally sensitive education,
2-To ensure that all teachers are Muslims and job opportunities get exclusivised for Muslims at least in Urdu medium schools, and
3-Urdu speaking parents could possibly guide the kids in their home coaching.
But at the same time, Muslims must be wary of its repercussions in matters of higher education. A child who has grown up learning zoo azaf aqal for LCM, mustateel for rectangle, murabba for square, darja e hararat for temperature, majlis e qanoon saz for Legislative Assembly, is all likely to develop disinterest for natural as well as human sciences after school primarily he would be learning a language other than his own. It is therefore necessary for Muslims to envision a future of a kid-turning-into-a-man. It is therefore necessary that kids are made to develop a vocabulary in vernacular language as well as in English. It is inevitable for a Muslim to be bilingual (or even trilingual) in an emergent India in order to realize his or her full potential.

Secondly, the Urdu linguistic skills are largely inapplicable in the market, courts, offices, banks, post office, railways, et al. Be it railway reservation forms or flight booking on Internet, or the water, phone or power bill, or operating the ATMs, or accessing the documents in municipal or government offices, it is the skills in local (or English) languages that rule the roost.

In a rapidly globalizing world, a lot many native languages are bound to lose their day-to-day relevance. It is not alone the question of survival of Urdu. The question haunts hundred of languages and dialects. UNESCO projections say only seven or eight principal languages would survive internationally. These are English, French, Spanish, Arabic, Chinese, Japanese, Russian and Hindi. It is better for Muslims to develop felicity in at least two of these languages and integrate themselves with international media, job opportunities and communication.

Right to education through mother tongue is guaranteed in the Constitution, but not the right to job

We need to be practical. Yes the Constitution of India does guarantee right to education through mother tongue in schools. But it does not necessarily guarantee jobs for all such students. Jobs and employment are decided by the market forces. English is not one among the languages in the 8th schedule of the Constitution but most high-paying jobs in private sector are available to English-knowing people. This is owing to the fact that most technical, professional and higher educational institutions teach through English medium and national and international businesses operate through English. So the practical wisdom should urge us to set our priorities right. Language formula should be decided at state level. If those who speak Urdu can opt for Urdu as the first language, it is sufficient. Often Urdu medium schools fare poorly in comparison to other medium schools because most teachers are Muslims, there is stress on rote learning, laxity in teaching, liberal evaluation (in order to see that every Muslim child passes) and relaxed monitoring by Urdu inspectors. There cannot be better way to commit collective suicide than having low quality education.

Quality springs from quantity

A lot of Muslims think in terms of setting up community run medical, engineering and management colleges. These are less likely to serve the community if there are no sufficient number of feeder institutions such as high schools and colleges imparting Pre-University education. Muslims in four south Indian states run at least 110 engineering, a dozen medical, 15 dental, and hundreds of other professional colleges. Barring a few, most of them do not have majority of Muslim students. So resource-short Muslims in UP, Bihar, West Bengal and Assam, should rather concentrate on improving academic performance of Muslim high schools and sending more of them into Government-run institutions where education is state funded. Investment on private coaching institutes for entrance exams or even providing scholarships and free board and lodging facilities in the Cities, is a viable alternative than investing hugely on mega ventures. Aligarh Muslim University could think of such initiatives. Its Constitution empowers it to initiate measures to ameliorate educational and social conditions of Muslims all over the country under article 5(2)c.

Gradually, the higher education is becoming a commercial proposition with less of social objectives. Thousands of BE seats in engineering colleges in South India go begging for students. Muslims must periodically review the changing higher education scene, financial dynamics of professional courses, court interpretations of Article 29 and 30, market needs and state as well as central Government policies. In short, a central think tank on Muslim education is the need of the hour.

There are enough of madrassas: Charities must now be directed towards modern education

There are simply too many madrassas in India. Nobody ever gives a thought if a madrassa is a prime need before setting up one. They are set up indiscriminately anywhere and everywhere if charities could be carved up. Several madrassas in Karnataka are now being run by moulvis from UP and Bihar just because religious charities come aplenty there. They often bring the students from those states and insist on teaching a syllabus that is out of sync with times. The graduates from madrassas suffer from low self-esteem as they are totally out of tune with the surrounding realities. Some of them even serve as cover for real estate, Hajj e badal and Umrah or qurbani businesses or take up matrimonial servicing. They are governed by no central affiliating, registering, auditing, certification, curriculum-setting or examining authority. The students graduating from their portals are fit for no job and therefore start new madrassas in smaller towns or remote locations and thereby perpetuate the backwardness of the community. The district of Basti in Uttar Pradesh has 371 large madrassas but only six primary schools run by Muslims.

Muslims must now think of investing their charities in modern education. Modern education creates self-reliance and nurtures self-esteem. It encourages creativity and innovation, the very essence of modern civilization. A community which has a vast army of muftis (opinion-givers) but no musleh (reformers) is bound to remain mired in the past.

Orphanages must be modernized

Most Muslim orphanages in India are run on traditional lines where the objective is to provide shelter to the destitute and the orphans. The focus is on physical well-being of the orphans rather than nurturing them into full human beings, self-confident, skilled and articulate. Kids are herded like flocks of goats and sheep, their heads tonsured regularly and are made to sit on the ground. Chowkidars keep them indoors within fortress like structures. They are object of abusive calls and everything is done to make them look like miserable creature. No effort is made to look at their innards, their psychological well being. No one sings them lullabies when they go to sleep, no one tells them the tales of chivalry of the legendary rulers of yore, no one relates them traditions of the holy Prophet, peace be upon him. Nor are they ever taken out on excursion or visits to parks, museums, botanical gardens and zoos. In Bangalore, we attempted two new institutions, ‘Rifaah Home for the Girl Child’ and ‘Ashiyana’ for the boys and introduced these reforms. Results are tremendous. In contrast, I questioned the traditional approach of herding the children like sheep in the century old orphanage here. The reply from the orphanage manager was: “If they cease to look like miserable kids, donations too would stop”.

Diversify professional profile

Muslims should take measures to diversify the professional profile of the community. Most bright students head for medicine, engineering and management courses. The community lacks able men and women in the field of law, journalism, fine arts, chartered accountancy, agricultural sciences, scientific research, designing, vernacular languages etc. Science and technology bring wealth and create disparities. People trained in journalism, law, sociology, economics should step into the field to even out the imbalances thus created. Not many thinkers, researchers, social and political scientists and economists, advocates have emerged out from the younger Muslims in India in recent years.

Pay Equal attention to Women’s education

Muslims must strive to include facilities for women’s education at all levels. Women’s role in the society is changing very fast. Women cannot be confined to cooking, washing and household chores any more. These functions are being taken up by machines. Muslims must think of inducting women into roles whereby their talents and faculties, which are on par with men, could be put to optimum use. Studies suggest that new kitchen aids, instant mixes and processed foods have reduced the actual cooking hours to merely one hour and 45 minutes. Studies also suggest that entry of one new home gadget (such as washing machines, remotes, mixers, vacuum cleaners) adds eight pounds to the weight of household women. Similarly, online facilities are expanding opportunities for women being employed (or used for income generation) in multiple ways.

Removing the disconnect between education and economy

Muslim artisanship is in decline. Modernisation and automation in the industry is sounding death knell for them. Several crafts have lost their relevance while others practically employ Muslims as daily wagers. Their finance, export and management is in the hands of persons who do not belong to the traditional occupational groups. Writing on the wall is clear: Modernise or perish. It will be unviable to carry on the crafts in the traditional way. Means and methods of production are changing every moment and they require new techniques, skills, calculations and methodologies. If education does not equip the younger generation, they will be misfits in the future society. Knowledge is doubling every five years and the community must keep pace with it. Unless it is done, the threat of irrelevance will loom overhead. It is where Muslims need to remove the disconnect between the education and economy.

During the last decades several occupations have been phased out. Sample these:
• Remember you would have kalaigars who would varnish your grandma’s copper and brass utensils once in a year. Aluminum and Stainless steel have replaced them. Kalaigars have vanished now.
• You would have your stone grinders (sil and okli) chipped once in a year. We used to call these people Takaras in Karnataka. They have become irrelevant due to modern blenders, mixers and juicers.
• STD booths have become irrelevant with cell-phone in every pocket. Thousands of such booths have vanished in oblivion within the last decade.
• Cyber centres are also on the way out as every cell phone would have Internet browsing facilities.
• Newspapers no longer have linotype typesetters. These machines are out. Even proof-readers job has been clubbed with sub-editors.
• Hoarding painters lost their jobs during 1990. Digital printing replaced them.
• Zari workers are losing their jobs as embroidery machines are coming in.
• Calligraphers were replaced by Urdu DTP operators.
• Silk reelers have been replaced by modern reeling machines.
• Photo studios have disappeared from our cities in thousands as digital cameras have eliminated the need for bromide photos.
• Banking has seen a big change from cheques to ATMs to Credit cards to mobile banking.
• Within next 20 years the printed newspapers will disappear. Various Browsing and reading devices will replace them.
• Credit cards and cheques too will vanish as money will be transferred through internet between businesses and banks by an individual who will merely press computer buttons and beeps and blips will signal transfer the cash from individual’s accounts to store’s accounts.
• There will be phenomenal changes in occupations like accounting, auditing, and dissemination of news, pharmacology, electioneering and voting, education, and training due to new online devices that will enter our lives.

As we advance deeper into the 21st century, the transformation in our lives would be much more drastic. We need to pattern our educational system for the future needs. Thomas Friedman in his book “That Used to be US” (2011) laments that US is falling behind in education as US school system is not one among the 10 best school systems in the world. PISA rating ranks Finland’s as the best education system. Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland, Japan, Hong Kong, and parts of China have overtaken the United States. We need to assess as to where do we stand?

……………………………..

Maqbool Ahmed Siraj is an eminent journalist and former Editor of Islamic Voice, Bangalore. He has also worked in the BBC World Service and writes regularly for the English daily Deccan Herald, Bangalore and several other magazines and journals. He also participates in various TV and radio programmes.

Note: This paper was presented at `The East & North East Educational Conference’ held on 26th October at Bhasha Bhavana Auditorium, National Library, Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal, organized by M M Foundation of Kolkata and Al Falah Mission of Berhampur, Murshidabad.

Related:

Educational conference in Kolkata for education among Muslims

Rhetorical shift in India’s foreign policy

$
0
0

By Syed Ali Mujtaba,

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh has outlined five priorities of Indian foreign policy that his government has evolved during its nine years of rule to firm up India's place in changing world order.

The Indian Prime Minister claimed that his government has reset the fundamentals of India’s foreign policy based on national priorities and concerns in concert with its capabilities and role and destiny in the world affairs.

First, international relations are increasingly shaped by our developmental priorities and the single most important objective of Indian foreign policy is to create a global environment conducive to the well-being of our country.

Second, India should integrate more closely with the global economy because it has benefited from globalization.

Third, India seeks stable, long term and mutually beneficial relations with all countries and is prepared to work with the international community to create a global economic and security environment beneficial to all nations.

Fourth, "Indian subcontinent's shared destiny requires greater regional cooperation and connectivity."

Fifth, "Our foreign policy is not defined merely by our interests, but also by the values which are very dear to our people.”

There is sub text in all the five points enumerated by the Prime Minister as his fundamentals of India’s foreign policy.

As far as his first point on creating global environment conducive for India, Prime Minister meant, he wants to create a global economic and security environment as India's relations with the world were increasingly shaped by its developmental priorities.

His second point is on globalization and likes India to integrate with global economy as our country would benefit a lot by greater integration with the world economy.

His third point maintaining long term relationship with all nations so that international community can freely invest in India and help in country's developmental activities.

His fourth point is lays emphasis on regionalism in recognition that the sub-continent's common destiny requires greater regional cooperation and connectivity. He likes India to strengthen regional institutional capability and capacity and invest in connectivity.

His fifth point on vales meant India's experiment of pursuing economic development should not be mercantilist but based on values. He defined India's core values as plural, secular and liberal democracy. He opinioned these values have inspired people around the world and would continue to do so. He would like India to align with such countries that espouse these values.

When we apply these five point objectives in the context of what India wish to achieve and where does it see itself in the changing world order, then the stark realities glares at our face.

The first foreign policy objective of creating global environment for developmental activities in the country does not sink with the domestic conditions prevailing for development in our country. The government policy of creating economic zones has run into trouble and many foreign investors have backed out due to lack of conductive global environment for investors. There is need to sort out India’s domestic developmental priorities before we promise to create friendly global conditions.

Second, pushing the cart of globalization is a mountain to climb. If globalization is the panacea of the mankind, then why there are nation states? Today, if a referendum is held on globalization, Manmohan government can only survive with the tricks it adopted to pass Indo-US civil nuclear deal, bribing the Parliamentarians.

Even though globalization can bring significant improvement but it has to answer some traditional nationalist questions like 'self-sufficiency' and 'self-reliance.' This has a huge challenge India has to tackle on the issue of globalization.

Third, point on seeking mutually beneficial relations and create a global economic and security environment beneficial to all nations seems to be rhetoric. When Indian economy was buoyed by 8-9 per cent growth and aiming higher growth, such words may sound music, but now when we are slipping to the Hindu rate of growth, such statement is mere hyperbole. The global economic slowdown and India’s economic mismanagement cast a shadow on this foreign policy objective.

On regionalism, Manmohan Singh’s idea of having "breakfast in Amritsar, lunch in Lahore and dinner in Kabul," may remain a dream. SAARC, the organization that’s pushing this agenda, is closing 40 years now and still taking baby steps. There is total disconnect between the talk and the realities on ground. There is no peace in India’s periphery and there is tension with all its neighbors, barring Bhutan. Terrorism poses a bigger challenge, not only to India but also to its neighbors. There is no sign of its containment. Besides, there are host of issues that vitiate peace in the subcontinent. So how this foreign policy objective of India could be achieve?

The last point on values is like saying; “I once had a girlfriend called America, she went on and on about freedom, while spying on me all the time!”

As Manmohan Singh talked about core values of India’s foreign policy objective, India’s Army Chief was delivering War games softwares and other deadly consignment to the Military Junta of Myanmar. In the war against the ethnic minorities in Myanmar, Indian weapons are freely used and against the rebels, who were fighting for the same values that India cherish. Those rebels had flashed to the media, ‘made in India bullets’ meant to kill them. So Papyji don’t preach! Is this the moral values you are talking about?

Manmohan Singh instead of making India’s foreign policy as another ‘Pachsheel’ if had stuck to his articulations made in 2004 as three point objectives, it would have been more modest summary of his international relations.

He had then said, the strategy was based on three pillars: "First, strengthen ourselves economically and technologically; Second, acquire adequate defence capability, and third, to seek partnerships to widen our policy and developmental options." He may have added this time that these are policies are at work has to be continued in future.

(Author is a Chennai based journalist. Views are personal)

‘Statue of Unity’ on one side: Asthi Kalsh Yatra on the other

$
0
0

By Ram Puniyani,

In the last week of October-first week of November, we saw two contradictory processes. On one side the foundation stone was laid for the statue of first Deputy Prime Minister of India, Saradar Vallabhbhai Patel, being called as Statue of Unity. On the other side the BJP in Bihar was taking out ‘Asthi Kalash’ (Pitcher of Ashes), of the blast victims in Patna. These victims died while the blasts took place in Modi’s Hunkar rally. While Patel completed the last lag of India’s unity as a nation, BJP combine’s Asthi Yatra Kalsh Yatra has meanwhile taken further the techniques which are divisive, and are an attack on the values of Fraternity ingrained in Indian Constitution. How do we understand the unity of India to begin with?

India’s unity begins with the coming of British. Pre British sub-continent made a journey from the tribal society, to pastoral society to kingdoms of different hues. Unfortunately there is a lot of confusion between kingdoms and the modern nation state. Pastoral society had different logic, while kings were sitting on the top of the structure in which the poor peasant was producing and large part of his produce was going to the king, through the landlord. The poor peasants were semi-slaves mostly at the mercy of the whims of the landlords. For the younger generation, the life in this period can be gleaned partly from the classics of the literary stalwarts like Munshi Premchand in particular. The British in their project to plunder this country introduced the policy of ‘divide and rule’ and so introduced Communal Historiography. This pattern of looking at kings, through the prism of the religion, made the matters worse for us as the kings now are looked at as Hindus or Muslims. And the period when some of the kings were ruling part of the area is called as Muslim period. The Muslim kings, ruled here, lived here and became the part of this soil. While British ruled from their head office in London and plundered the country. There was no concept of Nation-State at that time. Different kingdoms, warring with each other, trying to expand their boundaries on the strength of the sword.

With British, their plunder project led to the introduction of railways, communications and modern education. Whatever be the motives of British, this laid the foundation of geographical unity of India. The India we call today starts taking shape with that. But there is much else which transformed the ‘warring kingdoms’ to Indian state. The British policies led to discontent and the British system also opened some window of articulating the discontent. Unlike the period of Kingdoms, in the Colonial period itself many an associations of the rising classes, Industrialists, Workers and others started coming up. They formed organizations for the first time. And amongst the number of organizations Madras Mahajan Sabha, Pune Sarvajanik Sabha and Bombay Associations are some noteworthy. At the same time Narayan Meghaji Lokhande and Singarvelu started organizing the workers. All these organizations were veering around trade, occupation, work: not religion. These were having people from all regions, all religions. On the material foundations laid by British, these efforts added flesh and blood and ‘Indian identity’ starts taking shape. This is the foundation of the emotional and civilian unity of India, building on the geographical unification.

This foundation of India gets the walls of unity from the anti-colonial, ‘anti-British national movement’. It was the national movement with participation of people of all religion, all regions, all castes, all linguistic groups, women and men both that real Indian identity comes to be rooted in our psyche and in our civilian life. This movement ‘India as a nation in the making’ has been the biggest ever mass movement in the world. This movement was based on the values of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity, the principles which became the base of Indian Constitution. This was the Indian unity emerging from opposition to British rule; this was the unity for aspiration of building secular democratic India with composite culture. This led to our freedom with the partition tragedy accompanying it. This was the main structure of Indian unity. Some jobs were still remaining.

With freedom nearly 650 princely states, who were associated with British rule had to make their decision, to merge with India or Pakistan or to remain free. It is here that Sardar Patels’ final contribution of uniting India, as it is today, came as the icing in the cake, the plaster on the walls of National unity. This unity was emotional, civic and national. It included people of all religions that’s’ how Gandhi, Nehru, Patel and Maulana Azad, stick together despite their diverse background and different expression of the value and create the Indian nation state. Contrary to the hints dropped by Modi that Patel would have dealt with Muslims better, the approach of the great leaders of Indian freedom movement was overlapping. Patel was the one to give the provisions for minority institutions. Gandhi said about Patel, “I know the Sardar…His method and manner of approach to Hindu-Muslim question, as also several other questions, is different from mine and Pundit Nehru’s. But it is travesty of truth to describe him as anti Muslim.”

This process of emotional, civic unification which began with the formation of various associations went through the freedom movement and found its culmination in the integration of princely states, into the Union of India. The process of unification also began and saw a miniscule process of divisiveness even at that time. This divisiveness began with the religious nationalism of Muslim League and Hindu Mahasabha-RSS. This group came from the landlords and nawabs (Led by Nawab of Dhaka and Raja of Kashi) and was later joined in by the section of elite educated middle classes in the form of Jinnah, Savarkar and the founders of RSS. While Gandhi and National movement united all, the communal groups spread hatred against each other. This hatred against each other led to communal violence, the worst of which were to be seen in the Calcutta killings, Noakhali amongst others. It was Gandhi, who left the statecraft to Nehru and Patel and went to douse the communal fire.

After some gap, the process of violence began again with Jabalpur violence of 1961. At the root of violence is the hatred of ‘other’, propagated through word of mouth, through shakhas, through school books amongst others. This creates a ‘social common sense’. This ‘social common sense’ is totally negative against religious minorities and acts as the fertile ground on which the communal violence takes place. Various techniques were devised to orchestrate communal violence, pig in a mosque, beef pieces in mandir (temple), killing of cow, music in front of mosque, ‘molestation of ‘our’ women had been the major ones amongst them.

A new pattern has been added to this. After the siege of Babri in October 1990, the tragedy led to death of the kar sevaks. VHP took out the asthi kalash yatra and the yatra left the trail of blood. After the Godhra train burning (who did it is another matter, many theories abound, this article is not going in to that) let’s see how this tragedy was used to divide the community. The dead bodies were handed over to VHP to take out a procession. The mass hysteria was created during the procession. Rest is too well known. Society divided along religious lines. Despite diverse claims ‘division amongst Hindus-Muslim’, is a matter of concern in the country in general and places like Gujarat in particular.

Let’s now come to Kandhmal. Swami Laxmanand is killed. No debate about who did it. The VHP takes out a procession of Swamiji’s body through a long route. Violence against Christians follows. Further perfecting the technique, now after the Patna blasts, whoso ever did it, the dead bodies are being taken out in procession through various routes. Is it to pay homage to the poor victims despite whose death the rally continued, or the goals are to divide the society along communal lines? This is social disunity. Sardar Patel’s statue and life was for social unity, this and other acts of BJP combine are just for the opposite goals. Hypocrisy at its best or worst is at display here. Commemorate the Sardar who united India, not just by merging the princely states, but being the part of freedom movement which was the uniting movement. And also remember unity of India just does not mean the merger of princely states; that was the last phase of unity process. At the same time take out Asthi Kalash, which is aimed to divide the community? Political ambitions have strange ways.

--
Response only to ram.puniyani@gmail.com


UAE alumni forum of AMU celebrated Sir Syed Day in Shahrjah

$
0
0

By Mohd Mudassir Alam,

Shahrjah: “Jo abr yahan se uthhega, wo sare jahan par barsega; Khud apne chaman par barsegaa, ghairon ke chaman par barsegaa”, is the famous couplet from Aligarh Muslim University Tarana. Written by Asrarul Haq Majaz the couplet is positioned at almost at the end of AMU Tarana but it can be ranked as the heart. In fact, when sung in group the above mentioned couplet energizes the gathering and provides motivation. Penned in reference to represent the global representation of AMU alumni this couplet has been proved true by the proud Aligs in India and abroad. Over the decades the AMU alumnus spread across the world hardly had forgot their association with alma mater and try to remember the old days in different ways. Sir Syed Day celebration is one such occasion which is celebrated with great pomp and gaiety in various parts of globe by the old boys.

This past week Aligarh Muslim University Alumni Forum UAE celebrated 196th birthday of founder Sir Syed Ahmad Khan at Hotel Holiday International, Sharjah. Lt. Gen (Retd.) Zameer Uddin Shah, the Vice Chancellor of Aligarh Muslim University was Chief Guest of Sir Syed Day celebrated amidst a glittering ceremony in the evening 1st November in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Other noted names in the list of guests were Mani Shankar Aiyar, former Diplomat, ex Cabinet Minister, Journalist and Member of Parliament (Rajya Sabha), Dr. Suhail Sabir from Department of Chemistry, AMU, Aligarh and Mohammad Aslam, President of Human Chain.



While addressing the enthusiastic Aligs Lt. Shah said, “I have come as Vice Chancellor of AMU with certain goals and the aim to take the university among the best educational institutions in the country and world. If I get due support from the students, teachers and non-teaching staffs, I’m sure AMU would be no 1 university by the year 2016.”

“From this platform I appeal to the old boys of AMU settled in UAE and other parts of world for paying back to Aligarh Muslim University and make it a world-class university,” appealed Lt. Shah. He had also lauded the efforts of AMU Alumni UAE Forum for organizing the mega event in memory of Sir Syed Ahmad Khan.

Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar was quite elated after witnessing the unique type of celebrations in order to celebrate the birth anniversary of AMU’s founder Sir Syed Ahmad Khan. Mr. Aiyar had praised the event organizers and insisted over maintaining the secularism credential of India. He said, “Secularism in backbone of India and no one can destroy it. In fact, the country can’t move ahead with secularism as all religious faiths especially minorities are as important as the majority”.

S. M. Qutbur Rahman, President of AMU Alumni Forum UAE was quite emotional while delivering his speech. Mr. Rahman appealed to the Aligs for helping out the community and nation especially AMU in their best possible ways. Mohammad Aslam, President of Human Chain in his speech said that his NGO is focused towards educational upliftment but it is committed to work for the social causes and concern of the community. “AMU Kishanganj Centre is going to start from last week of November and I thank to Almighty for blessing us with a fruitful result. However, our mission and vision don’t end here, we will work for AMU Kishanganj till it becomes a full-fledged university with a handful of courses,” said Mr. Aslam.

It should be noted that Human Chain is a Delhi based NGO and it worked as a front-runner group for the establishment of AMU Centre in Kishanganj, Bihar. Human Chain was also rewarded for its excellent work in past one year for AMU Kishanganj Centre and other related areas by AMU Alumni UAE Forum. Mr. Aslam received the award on behalf of Human Chain amidst the claps of lively audience. Dr. Suhail Sabir was given away the award for AMU Alumni affairs in the ceremony. Many other awards and mementos were also given to the guests for their efforts in different areas.



The programme was conceived by AMU Alumni UAE Forum members Faizan Khan and Adil Akthar. It started in Islamic way with recital of Holy Qoran by Hafiz Moazzam Ahmad. The welcome address was delivered by Anis Ahmad, founder and former President AMU Alumni Forum. Vote of thanks was given by Mansoor Ali, General Secretary, AMU Alumni Forum UAE. Other highlights of the evening were AMU Tarana sung by UAE team, ghazal and songs by Husaain and Ms. Naina. Hilarious comedy was also part of the Sir Syed celebration, which was written by Firoz Ahmad.

AMU Alumni UAE Forum’s governing body and its members were quite delighted over getting the response from the Aligs residing in UAE and others who had participated from other parts of globe as guests. Really the Aligs studded evening in the beautiful city of Shahrjah was one of its kind rare and memorable event. The presence of AMU Vice Chancellor, often referred to as the “Janasheen of Sir Syed” added more charm in the Sir Syed Celebration.

CPI(M) relief committee finds Muzaffarnagar camps in ‘pathetic’ condition

$
0
0

By TCN News,

Lucknow: A relief committee consisting of Subhashini Ali, D.P. Singh and Shyamvir Rathi set up by the CPI(M) Central Committee to organise and oversee relief measures in the aftermath of the communal riots and clashes in Muzaffarnagar which have forced more than 50,000 Muslims to take refuge in camps being run in madrasas and mosques by community members and organisations.

Report of the Committee after visting camps in Muzaffarnagar:

The committee visited three areas on the 28th October. The first was Khampur village where the local relief committee has been able to acquire a few bighas of land and is helping some of the victims with material to build their own homes. We were able to see for ourselves that more than eighty houses are nearing completion and there are plans to build another 500.



After this, we visited two large camps of about 5,000 people each at Loi and Jaula. The conditions under which people are living are pathetic. In both places, small tents have been put up. They are so small that families are spilling out of them and are actually forced to live in the open. This despite the fact that there have been heavy rains in the area and now the cold weather has set in. The land on which the camp is located is owned by the State Government and is very low-lying, unfit for cultivation or housing. In fact, the organisers of the camp had to spend a lot of money to level the land and put up the tents. They are now hoping that the Government will allot the land to the victims and allow them to build homes there. They have approached the team of Ministers led by Shivpal Yadav who are supposed to be organising relief in the area with this demand but have not had any response so far.

Similar to this camp, is the Jaula camp. The victims in both these camps belong to the worst affected areas of Kutba, Fugana,Kharad, Shamli, Bahvari, Lisadh etc . Many people in these areas were killed or badly wounded. There are also 6 rape victims whose FIRs have been registered. There are 7 widows between the camps. One of the members of the organising committee is Com. Yameen, who has been a Party sympathiser and supporter for many years. Two comrades, whose families have been associated with the CPI(M), Pawan Jain and R.D. Maurya also belong to Jaula village.



Almost all the people in the camps are landless and poor. They belong to the labouring classes of barbers, blacksmiths, tailors, construction workers etc. They have lost what little they had and most of their houses have been completely destroyed and their possessions looted. They have even lost their tools and the implements they need for earning a livelihood. We felt that this was a problem that we should immediately try to address. At the Jaula camp, we were told that land is available for housing the victims in the vicinity. The organisers of the camp are planning to buy some land and then ask for help from others to construct the houses. The State Govt. had also announced that 1800 families who had been identified as having lost their homes would be given compensation of 5 lacs each. While this figure is much less than what it should be, payment of this compensation without any further delay would help in the rehabilitation process.

After visiting the camps, we decided on some immediate steps. All widows and rape victims in the two big camps will be given sewing machines. A headcount of people in different professions at the Jaula camp would be done without any delay and tools and implements would be provided to them from the local market. The possibility of constructing at least 50 houses on land to be accessed with the help of the local Relief Committee. If this becomes possible, it is proposed that the colony be named in memory of the legendary Communist leader, Maj. Jaipal Singh who belonged to Muzaffarnagar.



Despite the fact that a month and a half has elapsed since the vicious attacks on the minority community that took place on 8th September in many villages, the situation remains very tense in the area. There are many reasons for this. The first is the inability of the State Government to instill a sense of security and confidence among the victims and among the minority community in general. In the camps, the very inadequate supply of grains and milk that the Government had started in mid September were stopped more than two weeks before our visit. People in the camps told us that Government doctors and medical workers visited the camps for only a few days and then that also ended. As a result, many babies have died – we were told more than 30 in 2 camps. While we were in the camps, we certainly did not see any Government doctors of medical supplies. Many people were suffering from high fever and there is ever possibility of an epidemic breaking out. Even minimum sanitation is not being ensured by the Government nor is there any security at all.

Arrests of killers and rapists has also not been ensured. Only recently, a special task force has been set up to study the FIRs. As a result, there is tremendous pressure being exerted on the victims by the perpetrators to withdraw cases. This pressure is not restricted to threats but, in one case, the husband of a rape victim has had 3 false cases registered against him by the accused rapists. Even the political leaders accused of inciting violence and communal hatred have not been arrested. While 2 BJP MLAs were arrested after several weeks, a third is still at large. Similarly, a BSP MP is supposedly absconding while his family organises a huge wedding in their home, and an ex SP MLA has not even been charged. We met the DIG and raised these issues with him and he assured us that the rapists would be arrested within a week.



The Hindi press is also playing a very incendiary role. Its reports are very slanted and written in a way that exarcerbates communal feelings and polarisation. For example, there are reports that talk about the victims in the camps as if they are having a picnic. Then there are reports of people having set fire to their homes in order to get compensation. There is no sympathy at all for victims of terrible atrocities and violence. This is, of course, furthering the campaign of the Hindutva forces.

All our fears and misgivings were, unfortunately, proven correct when the ghastly murders of 3 Muslim villagers took place on the 30th. This incident was reported in the most duplicitous fashion but, fortunately, the police and administration have intervened effectively, accepting their earlier errors of judgment. While some arrests have been made there are allegations that have not been dismissed by the authorities that some PAC personnel were also involved in the killings. There cannot be a more horrible example of what the minority community is suffering than this.

Our committee felt that all efforts must be made to being secular-minded people into the campaign to bring people of the two communities together. Although our Party has a very small presence, we have planned large anti-Communal conventions in and around the district in early December. We are hopeful that our campaign will gain momentum and that all those who are feeling the need for the restoration of peace will join us.

Has Mahmood Madani accepted the existence of Indian Mujahideen?

$
0
0

Afroz Alam Sahil for BeyondHeadlines

For last few months, Indian Mujahedeen (IM) and its activities have become headlines on national news channels. Why it shouldn’t be? As all alleged masterminds of IM have been in the custody of our security agencies. And the security agencies uncovered many disastrous plans of these alleged masterminds.

Even investigative journalists are not behind in this case; they are disclosing new findings regarding ‘terror module’ of these alleged terrorists. But these journalists are over relying on disclosures of security agencies, instead on their own actual investigation.

It is also reported that many Muslim leaders are on the hit list of IM. This “sensational” disclosure is provided by Asadullah Akhtar (aka Haddi), who was being arrested along with alleged IM co-founder Yasin Bhatkal, during an interrogation by security agencies.

Haddi also reported to have revealed that SIMI former president Dr. Shahid Badr Falahi, All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) leader Kalbe Sadiq, Arshad Madani of Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind, and Rajya Sabhi Member Mohammed Madani are also on the hit list of IM.

Considering this alleged threat, the government and security forces planned to provide Z Plus Security to aforementioned Muslim leaders. Mohammed Madni has already been given Z Plus Security. According to Madani’s legal adviser Niyaz Farooqi the security has been recently provided to Madani as he’s been under threat for quite some time.

When contacted by BeyondHeadlines, Mahmood Madani told that he has already been getting security but now it’s upgraded to Z Plus by the government. When asked about being on the hit list of IM, he denied that and said he doesn’t have any such information. He also refused to answer any question regarding IM.

Whereas Kalbe Sadiq told BeyondHeadlines that the government offered security to him but he outrightly denied it. He confidently said he did not need any Y or Z security.

Arshad Madani said he did not believe in any organization like “Indian Mujahedeen”. He opined that IM is a pseudo organization created by the government and its intelligence agencies. Intelligence Dept. brings out such disclosures and statements to mislead people, he added. Madani said he did not require any security cover.

Rihai Manch president Adv. Shoeb stated: “Mahmood Madani has acknowledge presence of IB created terror outfit IM by accepting security cover. Anyways, to strengthen its stand IB sometimes arrests Bhatkal and alike while some other time it collaborates with Sangh Parivar to let blasts happen in Patna’s Gandhi Maidan.”

In this situation, Mahmood Madani’s acceptance of Z Plus security needs strong denouncement, Adv Shoeb said. He also added that statements and moves like these may mean IB could also possibly plan attacks on ulemas.

Milli Gazette Editor and AIMMM president Dr. Zafarul Islam Khan raised questions over the very existence of IM. He stated: “It’s a pseudo organization created by intelligence departments.”

Let’s not forget that Mahmood Madani earlier said Congress is creating Modi fear among Muslim to garner votes. Kalbe Sadiq too stated some time back that Modi would be given support if he changes himself.

In 2008, it was reported by media that IM allegedly declared Mahmood Madani as its biggest enemy in an email sent to a local channel. A conference against terrorism organized in Deoband by Jamiat Ulema Hind was cited to have been the reason for the IM mail.

On 28 February 2008, the conference has passed a number of resolutions. And the organization has conducted numerous other similar conferences across the country.

In 2012, media also revealed that Madani received life-threat. Madani himself issued police statement in this regard. Madani said he’s been receiving life-threatening calls on his personal mobile number.

Earlier, Madani reportedly received life-threatening calls at his Deoband residence landline phone, and he requested for police protection of his family and himself. Mahmood Madani’s acceptance of Z Plus Security lead us to think that he believes in the existence of IM. However, Muslims have always denied its existence.

Indian Mujahideen’s existence is yet to be proven in a court of law. Government had the opportunity to provide material to prove their charge that accused in Batla House encounters were indeed IM members. But government refused to provide any evidence to prove their claim and Delhi High Court threw out that charge.

In light of this will Mahmood Madani accept threat from an organization whose existence is yet to be proved?

--
The article was translated by SM Fasiullah and modified for TwoCircles.net. Afroz Alam Sahil is the editor of BeyondHeadlines.in

Modi: Inheritor of Patel’s legacy

$
0
0

By Kaneez Fathima

History has been distorted by the Hindutva ideology upper caste ruling class people and used as a weapon against backward classes as well as Muslims. It is in this scenario that the praising of Patel by Modi has to be seen and for a while now Patel is used as a new play card by the Hindutva ideologues even though he was a Congressman. It should be noted that Congress is a mixture of all kinds of people in it. Patel carried state sponsored genocide on Muslims in Hyderabad as well as other parts of the country. Later Narsimha Rao played an important role in Babri Masjid demolition. History is not only distorted but also being saffronised and infringed in the tender minds of children through school textbooks. State sponsored Hindutva hegemony was started by Patel and it became deep rooted in the regime of Modi in such a manner that the people are singing anti Muslim songs instead of national songs on 15th august which is Independence Day (Ex. Banayenge hum mandir banayenge etc.).

When the Britishers slowly occupied our country on the name of trade and started ruling over us, they observed that there are people of various castes with different customary habits. Then they slowly started implementing divide and rule policy that led to the division of this country into India and Pakistan.



Modi like Patel wear blood-stained clothes.

Though Mr. Gandhi is projected as father of nation but as per the records of Indian government the title was not conferred officially. It was not Gandhi who started freedom movement but was already initiated long time ago by rulers such as Bahadur Shah Zafar, Begum Hazrat Mahal of Awadh and Tipu Sultan and was followed by Jhansi Lakshmi Bai, Tantia Tope etc. After the suppression of 1857 first independence war, the Muslim clerics of Deoband and at other places played an important role and sacrificed their lives for the sake of country’s freedom. Then it was revolutionaries such as Bhagat Singh and Ashfaqullah Khan who came forward to free the country from the clutches of Britishers and they gave the slogan ‘Inquilab Zindabad’ (which has very wide meaning in it). It was Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind that for the first time made a call for complete independence of India. In these changing scenario, Gandhi and his team got afraid and negotiated with the Britishers for share of power with the Britishers and when that did not work out, in the course of time it was named as Independence movement. Many Muslims played a key role in the independent struggle but most of them are forgotten for eg. Ali Brothers, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, Rafi Ahmed Kidwai etc. (slowly names erased from history of even those Muslims who were in Congress).

The divide and rule policy of Britishers was further followed by the Indian leaders. It was basically C. Rajagopalachari (Rajaji) who planned for the division of the country in the year 1943 in his famous C.R. formula and got it approved by Gandhi. Gandhi and Patel proposed Mountbatten for the division of the country on the basis of religion and their basic idea was that when Muslims migrate to Pakistan, the upper caste ruling class can maintain their hegemony over the backward classes and indigenous people of India. Jinnah did not agree to the proposal of Mountbatten about the division of the country but was forced to accept it. Thus he is blamed for the division of the country.

In the year 1932 itself Communal Award was given to Muslims by the colonial rulers but Gandhi and Patel strongly opposed it. Congress continuously pressurized Muslims to leave separate electorates. Opposition against Muslims increased with the official declaration of Lord Wavell that there will be equal share of Hindus, Muslims and depressed classes after the transfer of power and it was Patel who opposed it very strongly. They were unable to digest that Muslims will also become the rulers of this country along with upper castes. Congress party thought that the upper castes can have complete control of power only after dividing this country on the lines of religion and they did as they thought. In result Muslims lost political voice in the Constituent Assembly. Patel had forced Muslims to give away the constitutional rights guaranteed by the objective resolution of the Constituent Assembly. In the year 1947 when a resolution was passed in the Constituent Assembly to cancel the separate electorates, quota in education and employment which was enjoyed by the Muslims before partition, there was no Muslim voice to protest against it.

Country was divided on the basis of religion and Muslims are blamed for it. After the partition many from the Muslim intelligentsia migrated to Pakistan but those intellectuals who remained and refused to go from India were robbed of their voices. Even Maulana Azad could do nothing about the communal politics played by Vallabhai Patel. Patel even killed thousands of Muslims in the name of merging Hyderabad state into the Indian Union under police action against the Hyderabad state. Even though he was a Congress man but it is his anti-Muslim actions which made Narendra Modi praise him and saying that he must have been first prime minister of this country. As Patel could not become prime minister, now Modi wants to become prime minister and complete Patel’s unfinished agenda. Patel was not nominated as Prime Minister because it was only Nehru and Jinnah in those times who had understanding and capacity to handle and maintain international relations.

Though Patel is praised as iron man and his role in merging 550 princely states into Indian union is appreciated as a major task, but it is forgotten that he has carried genocide on Muslims in Hyderabad state on the name of police action by attacking Hyderabad state without warning and lakhs of people were massacred. This cannot be justified by blaming Nizam and it has to be acknowledged that Indian Army under the leadership of Patel has carried genocide on Muslims, the scars of which are still fresh in the minds of the community. Moreover, Patel’s mindset can also be understood by his eagerness to recognize Israel as soon as possible by India, not only that he was pro-capitalist and pro-US. He might not have been a member of RSS but he was neither secular nor democrat. Even Jawaharlal Nehru had called Patel a communalist. The people who divided the country on the basis of religion, how can they be called as secular and in favor of pluralism? After the assassination of Gandhi by the RSS, it was banned, but the strangeness is that the charges of banning RSS were not the charges of murdering Gandhi but their speeches being full of communal poison. This itself shows Patel’s soft corner for RSS. And today if Modi is praising Patel then that is no surprise!

Patel was a staunch Hindu fascist and Modi is a Hindutva fascist who believes in Hindu nationalism. In the history of independence struggle there is no single name of RSS persons who devoted their lives for the sake of country’s freedom. Modi after carrying out Gujarat genocide has become hungry of making the whole country into a Hindutva laboratory. The people including the great personalities who are praising Modi are in fact justifying Gujarat genocide. Because if at all they had little concern towards humanity they can never praise or support Modi on the name of so called development. No one can exist for longer time sitting on the corpses of innocents. Therefore, the political end of Modi is nearing due to which he is making all kinds of weird statements.

It is time to remind ourselves that after Gujarat genocide, Modi had stated that Hyderabad is the next target. It is in this context also that he praises Patel and wants to build his tallest statue by collecting iron from all over the country ‘excluding Nizam iron’ as per his words.

True nationalists would never have proposed partition of the country, the conspiracy of partition itself proves who true nationalists were. Though India is called a democratic and secular country, no true secularism and democracy exists. If at all the so called secular parties were democratic at least by their mindset, then the democratic values would have been given priority and constitutional rights implemented. After 66 years of independence, the worst conditions of Muslims and Dalits are the proof that Democracy cannot be implemented in its true sense. Muslims are facing indirect untouchability and direct discrimination whereas Dalits are the direct victims of untouchability and discrimination in this secular and democratic country. By distorting history and putting blame on Muslims for partition will not change history. History will repeat itself. Therefore, we have to re-read and re-write our history and should not believe the people who are distorting it for their personal and political gains.

--
Kaneez Fathima is associated with Civil Liberties Monitoring Committee, Hyderabad

Ameer-e-Shariat Ataullah Shah Bukhari on Shi’a-Sunni differences

$
0
0

By Ataullah Shah Bukhari [1892 – 1961]

“The news of Shi’a-Sunni riots in different parts of the country has greatly hurt me. Muslims due to paltry issues have shed the blood of their brethren and all my efforts of the past forty years have thus gone waste.

“The basic cause of the Shi’a-Sunni conflict is the issue why Hazrat Ali became the fourth caliph and why was he not made the first one?

“Shia-Sunni differences in customs such as the Ta’zia tradition etc have nothing to do with the actions or edicts approved by their [Shi’a] scholars and ancestors. This is simply a ritual like many others that have prevailed among the Sunnis.

“I have been sitting here since yesterday. Why was I not given the chance to speak first? Is it not my insult? Maulana Abdus-Sattar Niazi spoke before me—he is an Ansari. Our Chief Organiser is an Arain and I am one from the Ahl-e-Bait, a Syed and a Hashmi. Those who converted from Hinduism to Islam were given the chance to speak first. Is it not the insult of Aal-e-Rasool? ——“

(There was pin-drop silence among the audience, he then asked the audience and taking their silence as an answer said), “Being the last speaker is not demeaning at all to me. When Maulana Abdul Sattar was about to start his address, I asked him that if he did not mind then I would like to speak first. To this he responded, ‘Who will care to listen to me after you?” (Ameer-e-Shariat then asked the audience. Is this an honour or an insult? To follow is not a proof of being less in degree or importance.

“This argument of mine is substantiated by the fact that on the night of Me’raj all of the Messengers of Allah SWT prayed behind Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Thus was our Prophet (PBUH) honoured or – God forbid – deemed to be less respectable?

“Muslims believe that Muhammad (PBUH) was the last Prophet and that no other prophet will ever follow after him. To keep this tradition of the Prophethood being the honour of the Hashmi family the Caliphate therefore should have also ended in the Hashmi family.

“The Sunnis believe that Prophethood ended with the Leader of all the Prophets Mohammad (PBUH) and similarly Caliphate ended with Hazrat Ali (RA). The Prophet of Mercy is the seal of Prophets and Hazrat Ali is the seal of caliphs. After Hazrat Ali started the rule of kings and those kings have been good and bad both.

“This is, however, a different issue that being a descendant of Ali (RA) I would have been happier if my great great grandfather was given the first caliphate. Or maybe, if I was around then, I would have become a candidate myself, like that Sir Syed was once asked what he would have done if he was there at that moment? To this Sir Syed replied, ‘I would have tried to succeed as the caliph.’ The fact is that Hazrat Ali was destined to be honoured as the seal of Caliphs.

“If all Muslims get united on this issue then what will there remain to differ? These Taziaz and processions are just frivolous things and nor are these part of our deen. Muslims should not pay attention to petty issues like these. But, alas! These petty issues are becoming major problems and have now led us even to bloodshed.

(With a smile on his face he then concluded) “There is no prophet after Prophet Muhammad (PBUH), no caliph after Hazrat Ali and no speech, in this meeting, after mine.”

Excerpted from Hyat-e-Ameer-e-Shariat by Janbaz Mirza. Published, January 1970, by Maktaba Tabsarah, Lahore. This speech was delivered on 27 August 1957 in a small town Kanda Sargana near Multan.

--
The post Ameer-e-Shariat Ataullah Shah Bukhari on Shi’a-Sunni differences appeared first on Urdu Media Monitor.

Viewing all 715 articles
Browse latest View live